MindfulMaverick@piefed.zip to Asklemmy@lemmy.mlKiluba · 23 hours agoWhy some people call it Natopedia the imperialist enciclopedia?message-squaremessage-square4fedilinkarrow-up13arrow-down14file-text
arrow-up1-1arrow-down1message-squareWhy some people call it Natopedia the imperialist enciclopedia?MindfulMaverick@piefed.zip to Asklemmy@lemmy.mlKiluba · 23 hours agomessage-square4fedilinkfile-text
I’ve read some people over here refer to Wikipedia like that. Do they only use western sources or something like that?
minus-squareCowbee [he/they]@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up2·12 hours agoEchoing Erika3sis’s great comment, Wikipedia represents the western viewpoint and consensus, not a global consensus and viewpoint, which leads it to being shaped by the institutions that have sway in the west.
Echoing Erika3sis’s great comment, Wikipedia represents the western viewpoint and consensus, not a global consensus and viewpoint, which leads it to being shaped by the institutions that have sway in the west.