• scarabic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    The judge can give idiot-level instructions to the jury, warnings to the jury, reprimands to the jury, whatever, as long as the trial is in progress. Once the verdict has been delivered, respect the process and the citizens and STFU. The shocking part is the open disrespect, not the opinion.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      21 hours ago

      So…

      In your head, if someone is t surprised by something, it means they support it?

      I just don’t understand how you got confused enough to type that in reply to my comment

      • scarabic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Yeah the reason that seems so hard to understand is because it’s a million miles away from anything I thought or said. All I said was that no one is shocked a judge feels that way about juries, they are shocked at the lack of decorum.

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Oh ok…

          It was that thing where someone just rephrases what they reply to without adding something.

          Thanks for verifying! I just like being sure.

          • scarabic@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            16 hours ago

            Nope, wow, wrong again, and confidently so.

            You seemed to think “legal experts” shouldn’t be surprised judges hate juries. And I was saying they aren’t, they’re shocked at the lack of decorum.

            Jesus Christ if I have to spell it out for you one more time I’m going to puke. Get it or dont - you’re on your own.