• Buffalox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    OK so where is the actual scientific paper?
    I don̈́t really care that much about journalistic interpretation, because their knowledge is generally sub par, and their reporting sometimes even decidedly misrepresentative.
    I’d much rather read the actual paper. I have even seen papers where the conclusion is contradictory to their own results in their research!!! Which to me indicate a paid for conclusion.

    • Reginald_T_Biter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Go to the guardian article from the OP. Find the link that was in the image I posted. Its pretty close to the top.

      • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        No skin in the argument, I just came to the comments trying to find the study because that link is broken for me. If it’s working for you, would you mind linking it here? I can’t find the specific one being referenced thru the miasma of google being absolute garbage and it being a recent enough publication that the academic DBs I have access to seemingly don’t have that issue yet.

        (splash screen at the broken link)