Since October 7, more than 3,257 children have been reported killed, including at least 3,195 in Gaza, 33 in the West Bank, and 29 in Israel, according to the Ministries of Health in Gaza and Israel respectively. The number of children reported killed in just three weeks in Gaza is more than the number killed in armed conflict globally – across more than 20 countries – over the course of a whole year, for the last three years.

  • ???@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    It’s impossible to know how many of these 3,257 children are actually children and how many are armed teens,

    And if they were armed teens, should we kill them? The ministry of health published the numbers. You can choose whatever age you deem acceptable for the Qassam Brigades and do some math to get the “real” number of children victims, if you like.

    It’s impossible to know how many of these 3,257 children are actually children and how many are armed teens,

    All of them are fucking children. Everyone under 18 is a child. Stop this bullshit.

    • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s disingenuous to suggest however there isn’t a difference between civilians and fighters. Either way though, yeah, they’re all children. I don’t know if it’s more horrifying for a child soldier to be killed vs a civilian child either. It’s two different kinds of horror.

    • shatal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Bigger font doesn’t make you more right.

      You can choose whatever age you deem acceptable for the Qassam Brigades and do some math to get the “real” number of children victims

      That’s just the thing with manipulating numbers - we can’t do the math. That’s why it’s so effective and why you need to apply critical reading to these kind of reports.

      And if they were armed teens, should we kill them

      Answer me this - say you have a group of people preparing to launch a rocket. That rocket is inaccurate but they aim it towards a city. There’s a high chance that you’ll be able to intercept it, but there’s always a chance that it’ll fall on a building and kill civilians.

      You can target this group, drop a bomb on them and stop them from firing this rocket. Now you learn that 2 of them are 17 years old. Do you drop the bomb? Or do you let them fire the rocket?

      • ???@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        In that example, I would be in prison because I refused to join the IDF.

        • shatal@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          So by avoiding any action you would allow them to fire the rocket.

          I understand and respect that.

          It’s a huge gray area and just one example of the complex morality component of this conflict.

          • ???@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            By avoiding being part of the apartheid system of Israel, I’m one step in the right direction.