I think it’s worth pointing out that interpreting something so benign as this in such a hostile way is indicative of a seriously unhealthy relationship with social media. I mean no offense, but now might be a good time to re-evaluate your browsing habits and maybe see if you can’t cut some algorithms out.
Nothing. Their suggestion is nothing. They said this is a good thing. They’re lamenting the fact bigots will use this as a cudal to weaken the alliance. The thing they think is bad is the bigots, not queer rights.
And your suggestion is? Simply not giving queer people rights?
I think it’s worth pointing out that interpreting something so benign as this in such a hostile way is indicative of a seriously unhealthy relationship with social media. I mean no offense, but now might be a good time to re-evaluate your browsing habits and maybe see if you can’t cut some algorithms out.
Nothing. Their suggestion is nothing. They said this is a good thing. They’re lamenting the fact bigots will use this as a cudal to weaken the alliance. The thing they think is bad is the bigots, not queer rights.
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/principle_of_charity
Gotta love the Internet. Unless you fully agree with side A, then certainly you’re siding with B! I just sated facts, my friend.