Disclaimer: I pretty much don’t like Rust, but most criticism of it boils down to culture war.

    • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Just wrap it in unsafe tags and you can accomplish the same things you can already do in any other language!

    • lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Excuse me but, can Rust even give me undecipherable Lore Ipsums of diagnostics at the same level that C++ can? If not, it’s not even a competition.

      • Mubelotix@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        This may be cheating but yes, sometimes there are cycles in type/generic definitions and the compiler loops their identifiers over and over, nesting them inside each other

    • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      But be noted it’s really not a drop-in replacement language for C-derived languages. It’s more like OCaml with curly brackets.

      • Mubelotix@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Yes of course. But there is nothing you can’t do. Only thing that may retain some of you is tooling that wasn’t ported