Since Israel and the United States began their war on Iran last week, retaliatory missiles fired at Israeli targets have been flying through the skies over the occupied West Bank.

But it has been Israeli settlers on the ground who have been terrorising Palestinians in their small hamlets across rural areas of the West Bank more than the Iranian missiles or the Israeli interceptors trying to shoot them down.

Thus, when debris from one missile crashed about 20 metres (22 yards) from the century-old Mosallam family home in the northern West Bank village of Duma earlier this week, Thabet remained unfazed by the threat.

“We have the rockets in the sky, but the [Israeli] settlers are at our door,” the 24-year-old said. “Of course, the settlers and the army, they are the ones who pose a danger to us. They are what we are afraid of right now.”

    • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      Occupants sounds less worse than a settler. Settlers are known for genocide over history, the term occupants has little historical usage.

    • Taldan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      Can you explain why we should soften our language? Settlers already feels like propaganda levels of soft terminology. I don’t see why it should be softened even more

      They’re stealing the homes of vulnerable people through terroristic fear and violence