Anarchy is very cool, until someone has the wrong opinion.

  • Paragone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    19 hours ago

    SuperEars

    Critical Thinking.

    ( & your selective-framing which leaves-out the actual-problem, can go eat rocks )

    Archy is the hierarchy that civilization uses as its skeleton & nervous-system.

    Hierarchy was the original, & the Hierarch was the original top-person.

    Got a brain in your body??

    THAT is archy.

    The people who pretend that no-archy is the ideal, ignore the blunt fact that within their own bodies, they eradicate anarchy, allowing ONLY archy to operate, because it is orders-of-magnitude more effective & viable & healthy.

    & they pretend that anarchy ought rule the world.

    Parent-child relationship: ought that be archy, or no-archy?? Toddler wants to take the car for a spin, & parent-boss won’t allow that?? Archy.

    Ought aviation be unregulated, in anarchy, or regulated, in archy?

    How about licensed surgeons? No-archy/no-regulation, XOR archy/regulations?

    How about manufacturing? No-regs/no-archy? or regs/archy?

    The ideological won’t-know/intentional-ignorance in both right & left is stunning.

    And some of us are sick of all of it.

    Yoga, not communist-party-imperialism, not no-archy-fuzzbrainedness-which-ignores-how-even-our-bodies-work, & not personal-imperialism/fascism, but yoga, the harnessing & binding in efficient & effective coherent-directional-harmony, is the right way.

    ( :

    _ /\ _

    • LurkingLuddite@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      lol

      If you’re losing the battle of wisdom against a toddler, perhaps there is a reason to listen to that toddler…

      You seem to not understand how anarchy works. It is not, “no rules and everyone is equal amd does what they want”. It’s, “nobody is given de facto authority over others with which they can cudgel their compatriots”. Not having de facto, unquestionable authority is a long ways away from, “there are no rules for society”.