cm0002@infosec.pub to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 18 hours agoPride Versioninginfosec.pubimagemessage-square66fedilinkarrow-up1928arrow-down19
arrow-up1919arrow-down1imagePride Versioninginfosec.pubcm0002@infosec.pub to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 18 hours agomessage-square66fedilink
minus-squareNeatNit@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up78·13 hours agoIt’s more logical than Linux’s version numbering system: Does the major version number (4.x vs 5.x) mean anything? No. The major version number is incremented when the number after the dot starts looking “too big.” There is literally no other reason. https://www.kernel.org/category/releases.html
minus-squareKilgore Trout@feddit.itlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16·8 hours agoAnd «too big» for Linus is around 20.
minus-squaregrrgyle@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up12·8 hours agoSee that’s totally logical, but it makes more human sense than computer sense.
minus-squareMidnitte@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13·11 hours agoIt’s logical if Linus has some numbers autism
minus-squareCanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up7·4 hours agoHmm, guy who wrote his own kernel because he didn’t like the ones that existed. I’m sure he’s totally neurotypical. /s
minus-squaresip@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·5 hours agoidk for me it’s easier to rember ex xdna was merged on 6.14 than 2.253
It’s more logical than Linux’s version numbering system:
https://www.kernel.org/category/releases.html
And «too big» for Linus is around 20.
See that’s totally logical, but it makes more human sense than computer sense.
It’s logical if Linus has some numbers autism
Hmm, guy who wrote his own kernel because he didn’t like the ones that existed. I’m sure he’s totally neurotypical. /s
idk for me it’s easier to rember ex xdna was merged on 6.14 than 2.253