BRUSSELS — Doom scrolling is doomed, if the EU gets its way.
The European Commission is for the first time tackling the addictiveness of social media in a fight against TikTok that may set new design standards for the world’s most popular apps.
BRUSSELS — Doom scrolling is doomed, if the EU gets its way.
The European Commission is for the first time tackling the addictiveness of social media in a fight against TikTok that may set new design standards for the world’s most popular apps.
Reading this on Jerboa with infinite scrolling 😱
IIRC Dessalines (Lemmy and Jerboa frontend dev) once said to regret adding infinite scrolling, and the only reason he didn’t remove the feature is because people would rage. So odds are Jerboa will be one of the first to comply.
And… frankly? As much as I criticise Lemmy devs, I think Dessalines is right in this one.
Voyager (like Apollo before it) has the option to disable infinite scrolling, I won’t use a client without it
But why? I don’t mind infinite scrolling here. And an option to opt in/out and everybody’s happy I suppose.
Because it’s a piece of addictive design. Here in Lemmy it’s fairly isolated, so not a big deal; but in larger and corporate platforms, it’s coupled with even more addictive design, in a way that you’re basically “stuck”.
Because infinite scrolling makes it easier to keep scrolling, and harder to stop scrolling. With a traditional web page, you have to make a conscious choice to click through to the next page and load more content. With an infinitely scrolling app, you have to make a conscious choice to stop. And because making choices takes mental energy, the infinitely scrolling app is harder to leave than the finite web page.
Like the article says, this is one of the design choices that make a social media platform more addictive.
Whether you mind infinite scrolling or not isn’t the point. Just because you like the function doesn’t make it good for you.
I see how it can create problems for some, but OTOH I also don’t want some bureocrats tell me what’s good for me. I bet those are the same bunch that brought us infinite cookie warnings clicking.
These same policy wonks tell you to wear a seat belt because that’s (proven) good for you; as is not smoking. They tell everyone ELSE not to speed because those wonks know everyone else is a terrible driver, and that’s better for you. These are the types who maintain building code and human rights and legal process because - yep - it’s better for you.
There’s a trend, here. I get that we sometimes feel opposition to things, but when there is science behind it - sit DOWN, RFKjr and the rest of you whackadoos - it’s usually good to go with it.
Nah, cookie banners are a malicious compliance tactic adopted by the advertising industry after they got told they can’t surveil the whole of the internet without consent.
The bureaucrats are actually hard at work to get rid of cookie banners in the very near future, making it obligatory to follow an in browser setting. You click decline once on install, and that’s it is the plan.
I am so braindead I can’t even imagine how it would work without endless scrolling?
X amount of posts before it stops scrolling. Then you’d have a classic “next page” button like we used to.
Basically you add a conscious choice to keep going, and creating a much more natural stopping point.
Pagination
You reach the bottom of the feed and have to click something to load another page or reload the forum
The website uses pages instead of infinite scrolling. I guess that’s compliant then.