Many of the girls at risk of FGM are under the age of 5, the UN says. Around 230 million women and girls around the world are survivors of the practice.

  • HazardousBanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    18 hours ago

    You’ve claimed we should ignore other forms of mutilation because “whataboutism.”

    Wrong, bitch.

    I told that other user that they were doing a whataboutism… because they were fucking doing a whataboutism. They were effectively delegitimizing FGM because “well what about MGM???”.

    Just because there’s an effort and focus on FGM doesn’t mean there is none for MGM. Yet that user was suggesting otherwise.

    Its the same incel logic that states the existence of feminism and women’s empowerment takes away from and harms men. It doesn’t.

    I think it’s reasonable to argue that any kind of mutilation should be prohibited,

    Except that isn’t what that user was saying. It wasn’t “and we should also combat MGM”. It was “OH YEAH? WELL WHAT ABOUT MGM HUH?!?! WHY ARENT YOU FOCUSING ON THAT RIGHT NOW?!?!”

    instead of carving out exceptions. By that logic, my question remains: do you disagree, or should we instead just try to make female genital mutilation less bad?

    No, your question is still suprememly fucking stupid and your interpretation is exceptionally moronic.

    FGM and MGM should both be banned, and any suggestion that my stance was otherwise is you yourself being incredibly dense.

    • poopkins@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      18 hours ago

      [email protected] wrote:

      Wrong, bitch.

      You seem terribly upset, but there’s no need for name-calling. Nobody is “delegitimizing” anything here except what you are making of others inputs to the discourse.

      For what it’s worth, we both agree mutilation is wrong and should be prohibited, so there’s really no reason to be so angry and childish in the first place.