Around Europe, governments and institutions are seeking to reduce their use of digital services from U.S. Big Tech companies and turning to domestic or free alternatives. The push for “digital sovereignty” is gaining attention as the Trump administration strikes an increasingly belligerent posture toward the continent, highlighted by recent tensions over Greenland that intensified fears that Silicon Valley giants could be compelled to cut off access.

  • _‌_反いじめ戦隊@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Read the🧵 below you. My stance is the politics of enforcing this on the population. If France was smart, they would have emigrated to JitsiMeet or Jami already. But no, it wants to control more than just how video is streamed.

    • NotAnOnionAtAll@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      If France was smart, they would have emigrated to JitsiMeet or Jami already.

      And then they would force you to use one of those, so your original argument “State forced == bad” still does not make any sense.

      Not saying you are wrong about JitsiMeet or Jami being better choices, but that just wasn’t part of your original argument even with a very generous interpretation.

      • _‌_反いじめ戦隊@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        21 minutes ago

        It does: With open source WebRTC implementations, you can do keyframing signatures to verify the video isn’t edited. But again, we both know what France really wants to enforce.