996: 9 a.m. to 9 p.m., 6 days a week

Sure, they’re burnt out, sluggish, surly, but… they’re present. And when they’re present, they’re not out in the world spending their income. They don’t need an expensive apartment or house, all they do there is sleep. Why have a fancy car when all you do is drive to/from your shitty job in it? Family? Who would have children with somebody who works such a schedule?

Even if you got more productivity from the same workers on a 9 a.m. to 3 p.m., 4 days a week schedule, you’d have to pay them more, not just per hour but overall, because they’d be out spending money on those afternoons / evenings and 3 days a week they have off. Organizing, demanding better healthcare, dental, more paid time off for vacations, and higher total wages to support all these “needs” they invent for themselves on their time off.

Keep 'em locked down, keep 'em tasked with … anything, doesn’t matter if it’s productive or not, as long as it keeps them on-the-job and not spending their pay.

Edit: apparently this isn’t clear: 996 is a horrible idea from all perspectives, it’s bad for the workers and bad for their employers overall. But, in certain twisted views, it would be a bit like military service where the (bulk of the) workers get a pitifully small paycheck, but they don’t have any real expenses so they have the option to save it all. 996 would turn that more into a wage-slave implementation where the pitifully small paycheck is just enough to meet their pitifully small expenses. In the China tech sector where they have implemented this (it is now illegal, but still practiced) they also do things like install anti-suicide nets in the stairwells of the highrises the workers work and sleep in.

  • Annoyed_🦀 @lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 hours ago

    No, it’s about keeping worker locked down and denied them the time to rest or find another job. I work 51 hours a week and most people in my line of work tend to stay in line because they’re too tired physically and mentally to look for another job.

    As we like to joke, all the money we earn we give it to doctor.

    • MangoCats@feddit.itOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      at the high health cost? Is it really worth it?

      Look at who’s promoting 996, I don’t think any of them take any responsibility for their workers’ health.

  • Ledivin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    18 hours ago

    I’ve literally never heard of anyone doing this. I’ve heard of 9 9s, which is 9 hour days with every other Friday off, but that’s obviously the complete opposite of whatever this silly burnout schedule is.

    • MangoCats@feddit.itOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      It was practiced in the Chinese tech sector for a while, then made illegal by their courts - but it is still practiced in private firms there due to lax enforcement.

    • artifex@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      17 hours ago

      If you’re salaried there is effectively no limit on the hours you can be made to work (or else get fired). The job description just has to make clear that it would be impossible to get the workload done in a typical 40 hours. And even that is mostly optional.

  • slazer2au@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    18 hours ago

    if people are at work, not spending money at shops, restaurants, and other entertainment services how will the consumer driven society work?

    • MangoCats@feddit.itOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Now you’re being rational, looking at the big picture. Anyone promoting 996 is, first, using it for shock value, and second, promoting a: me first, me always, me only. perspective on what’s desirable - for the company owners. Workers? Meh, they bought trickle down once, why not try that again? /s

    • fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Exports primary economy. I mean that falls apart if you remember the world economy is also people but myopic nationalist are happy with it