QuinnyCoded@sh.itjust.works to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 2 days agoa bit of advicesh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square37fedilinkarrow-up1996arrow-down15
arrow-up1991arrow-down1imagea bit of advicesh.itjust.worksQuinnyCoded@sh.itjust.works to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 2 days agomessage-square37fedilink
minus-squareSanctimoniousApe@lemmings.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up66·edit-22 days agoWith the limits of longevity still being pushed, I’d suggest sticking with the OP binary search theme and start at 64.
minus-squaremarcos@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up29·2 days agoWell, round numbers will indeed make the math easier.
minus-squareZiglin (it/they)@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·9 hours agoSo 64 is absolutely perfect being 1000000 in binary, then all you need to do is go one bit a time for a binary search.
minus-squareFuglyDuck@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up26·2 days agoIf you like round numbers, 69 is all curves.
minus-squareKlear@quokk.aulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 day agoThere was something familiar about the number on the desk. The handwriting was all pretty curves.
With the limits of longevity still being pushed, I’d suggest sticking with the OP binary search theme and start at 64.
Well, round numbers will indeed make the math easier.
So 64 is absolutely perfect being 1000000 in binary, then all you need to do is go one bit a time for a binary search.
If you like round numbers, 69 is all curves.
What a sexy, sexy number
There was something familiar about the number on the desk. The handwriting was all pretty curves.