Donald Trump’s desire to annex Greenland will not be thwarted and there could be meaningful U.S. action related to the Arctic island within “weeks or months,” according to a senior administration official.

That’s the view of Thomas Dans, Trump’s Arctic commissioner. He’s regarded as one of the main proponents of the president’s interest in Greenland, an idea first brought to Trump by billionaire and former diplomat Ronald Lauder.

Dans has been working on the issue since 2020.

  • I_Jedi@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    If this happens, I predict that Trump will make his move in late October. It’s the sweet spot for diverting everyone’s attention to NATO’s response. It also gives a few weeks for Trump to launch a followup attack on Iceland or Ireland if NATO doesn’t hit back.

    • a_non_monotonic_function@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 days ago

      Wow, that is a lot of planning. Like, more than he can do.

      It happens when the absolute worst news hits about how he harmed children.

      Could be next week for all we know.

    • SreudianFlip@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      Hello? It’s Greenland. The sun disappears around then, which will favour NATO forces. The USA military isn’t well trained or equipped for that, compared to Denmark/Canada/Finland/Sweden etc., and oddly has a personnel deficit in terms of training and snowmobiles if it’s fullblown war with NATO’s remnants. Greenland is a special environment, and kills equipment and noobs alike.

      They have to try in the late spring, then act like they own it with bluster and bullshit.

      As usual, the corpulent US military will be able to occupy the nation easily in a few days, but holding it? While things fall apart at home, and strategic priorities pop up in the pacific and Latin America?

          • romkube@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            Because attacking a friendly allied (Greenland) is just met with a shoulder shrug among the American public…

            • SreudianFlip@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 day ago

              I think you’re being sarcastic? Sure the end of NATO and subsequent murderous imperialism might trigger a major political rupture in the USA, especially when the economic losses and body counts come in, but there’s a possibility the magafascists can spin things along with just a lot of dissent and lost trade. If civil war doesn’t start over that, pretty sure some states would move to secede over an invasion of Canada.

    • critical@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      An Austrian painter made it look like his country was attacked, so he could justify invading them. We could see something similar this time again.