A scheme to encourage climbers to bring their waste down from Mount Everest is being scrapped - with Nepalese authorities telling the BBC it has been a failure.

Climbers had been required to pay a deposit of $4,000 (£2964), which they would only get back if they brought at least 8kg (18lbs) of waste back down with them.

It was hoped it would begin to tackle the rubbish problem on the world’s highest peak, which is estimated to be covered in some 50 tonnes of waste.

But after 11 years - and with the rubbish still piling up - the scheme is being shelved because it “failed to show a tangible result”.

    • Luminous5481 [they/them]@anarchist.nexus
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      5 hours ago

      the guides who make their living taking people up the mountain would be out of a job. the industry supports thousands of people, shutting it down would mean those families and their children would starve.

      • LastYearsIrritant@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        5 hours ago

        So it’s ok to destroy the environment just so a few more people can “earn” a living being servants of the ultra rich?

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          Glass houses, “friend.” As an English-speaking person posting on Lemmy, your lifestyle is almost certainly 10x worse for the environment than some Sherpa’s is. And you probably serve the ultra rich too, one way or another.

          • Insekticus@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 hour ago

            So what you’re saying is we should dispose of the wealthy and spread their assets and wealth out and lift up the lives of the Sherpas and other less fortunate individuals?

            I agree. Fuck the oligarchs and the multimillionaires who zealously support them.

        • frongt@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          3 hours ago

          No, but it would be even worse to suddenly cut off the primary income for people relying on it to survive.

        • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          edit-2
          5 hours ago

          How much do you earn compared to the average rural Nepali, and do you ever do anything bad for the climate?

          This isn’t even a climate change issue, it’s just garbage that can be picked back up, and which is only ever seen by other climbers.

        • Luminous5481 [they/them]@anarchist.nexus
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          is it OK to let little kids starve when you can feed them and clean up the environment at the same time? and what’s with this quotation marks around the word earn? that’s some privileged bullshit from somebody who has clearly never been hungry or homeless.