Threw paint in the engine, and went at the plane with crowbars.
Besides, the main incident for which it was proscribed involved a policewoman being badly injured in a sledgehammer attack, to the extent her spine still hasn’t recovered enough to return to work over a year later.
They threw paint on some military equipment. Claiming “criminal property damage” is quite the slanted representation of reality.
Not terrorism
The paint was inside a jet engine so it wouldn’t work. Property was damaged.
However, the planes experienced no terror.
Cue the US liberals: “this is just SO uncouth.”
Threw paint in the engine, and went at the plane with crowbars.
Besides, the main incident for which it was proscribed involved a policewoman being badly injured in a sledgehammer attack, to the extent her spine still hasn’t recovered enough to return to work over a year later.
None of what you describe is terrorism. The proscription is a disgrace, built upon a disgrace.
Surely deliberately causing injury with a political goal is terrorism?
What? No. Look it up. Also, PA did not plan to 8njure any police officers
Uk sending weapons to a genocidal state to kill innocent civilians becausw Israel is a political ally is terrorism
Secret Report Undercuts U.K. Condemnations of Pro-Palestinian Group