• Pyr@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    If they ban social media they should also make it illegal to block access to a website without an account.

    They should still be able to browse Facebook and Instagram even without an account, since they are no longer legally able to have an account, and communities and government still insist on posting important information through social media websites that younger people should be able to have access to.

  • randomaside@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Its basically illegal to be young. I don’t think this is going to change anything. Kids are on the internet because they cant legally express being anything but a minor until they’re a third through their life. They’re constantly monitored, censored, and scrutinized. I think large tech corps are exploiting a real need kids have to participate. Sometimes ::tin foil hat:: I believe this is by design. Thanks for coming to my tedx talk.

    • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      you’re expected to be grown up and mature by 18 which is impossible because you could never make any experiences at all

      you can’t drive anywhere if you grow up in a rural area and your parents refuse to drive you anywhere (happened to me, mum only let me see that one kid from rich parents to socialize because she wanted me to “grow up in good neighborhood” - needless to say, it didn’t work out and we don’t have contact anymore).

  • orioler25@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Yeah. Its worse for them, they know that, we all do. It isn’t about what’s good for them it’s about how fucking terrified liberals are of their inability to control the internet as young people make memes about how rad public transit and killing corporate executives is.

  • Digit@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    How will they ever know if they cannot spy on them via “social media”[1]?

    [1: presumably the term’s used as the corporate media uses it, meaning only the corporate spyware “social media”, not the fediverse.]

  • rosco385@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    The teen social media ban is just a distraction, carefully crafted by gambling industry lobbyists to ensure no one was talking about restricting gambling advertising.

  • Fluffy Kitty Cat@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    3 days ago

    It won’t. Hurting teenagers is in the entire point, especially certain vulnerable groups like LGBT teens.

  • low@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    I started using social media when I was around 12 and I can say with confidence it brought me significantly more harm than good.

    For those opposed: should we let them have cigarettes as well?

    • non_burglar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Your argument might have some weight if Roblox had been included in the ban. You know, Roblox, the well-known haven of groomers and pedos.

      • low@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I get where you’re coming from but I think this ban is based around intent. While Roblox is definitely an evil ass company, their ultimate goal is to make entertaining games and make money off purchases in those games. Also, they’ve already implemented ID checks for voice chat and even then it’s quite heavily moderated.

        The ultimate goal of social media is simply addiction, data harvesting, and selling that data to everyone who’ll pay for it.