• prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    summarized

    Oh, then surely the Google AI can tell us exactly what it summarized so we can confirm accuracy, right?

    • dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      If you’re not happy to see it then move along. Why you feel the need to comment on things you don’t like.

      I’m happy to see so I’ll stay and engage.

          • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            24 hours ago

            I’m not sure, that’s why I was asking about the source of what it’s allegedly summarizing.

            That’s a problem with Google AI, you can’t be sure if it’s pulling the data from somewhere or just making it up whole cloth

            • dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              21 hours ago

              Ah i see. I guess I dont care (not in a negative way to you) for something like this where it means nothing to me if these figures are made up as I’ll never think of it again and it satiates the curiosity still.

              I will say only really trust LLMs with my field of expertise as I can be confident I know when it’s talking shite.

              • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 hours ago

                Why don’t you care about believing true things? You really don’t care if the information being fed to you is true or not? Can you not understand that this is the exact mindset that has led us to the anti-intellectual hellhole we now reside in?