• SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’m not a gamer, so I had to look up the definition of a third-person shooter. It seems like very poor terminology; it’s actually a second-person shooter. There’s the player (1st) giving commands to an on-screen avatar (2nd). Where’s the 3rd person?

    I’m thinking a true third-person shooter would consist of an NPC shooting at your unarmed avatar?

    • Croquette@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      The terms are used because of the narritive forms of a story.

      1st person is from the point of view of the character, thus the view from the eyes of the playable character.

      3rd person is he/she perspective. You follow the character from the narration of an external narrator. You see the playable character do actions from a perspective that isn’t their own or someone’s else.

      2nd person would be from the point of view of a person involved with the character but isn’t it. So you would see the actions of the character through the eyes of an NPC. There was a demo floating around YouTube where a player was shooting zombies, and the camera was from the POV of thr zombies. It made it look pretty weird.

      • PyroNeurosis@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I imagine certain tactics games could possibly count in this vein - you as the commander on the uplink give orders to the team what does the actual shooting.