• entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    15 hours ago

    More likely mismanagement, miscommunication, rewrites, and incompetence than corruption.

    All projects of sufficient complexity overrun their cost/time estimates. That’s not even accounting for designers and programmers trying to hit what is likely a moving target.

    • t3rmit3@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      15 hours ago

      92 million dollars over cost on a 4.1 million dollar project is not incompetence and mismanagement.

      Doubling the cost of a project should have triggered reviews or an audit. 23x’ing the cost of a project is either corruption, or such gross negligence with public funds as to be criminal all on its own.

      • entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        The 4.1m was the budget for the front-end. The back-end changes were initially budgeted as 31m but tripled in cost as the project dragged on and contracts needed to be extended.