There are tons of women who enjoy the damsel in distress trope and think it’s harmless fun.
There are also tons of women who think it perpetuates sexist stereotypes against women.
Both groups of women’s opinions are equally valid.
Does this not prove that the statement is independent?
Yes, you’re right (except it’s not a joke). Not sure why the other person seems to be dismissive about model theory, reducing an entire field of mathematics to “people are different and think different things”.
But I still wonder : Are there any axioms that can decide the statement about damsels in distress, just like how axioms can be added to ZFC that decide CH, like V=L and proper forcing axioms as I pointed out?
Real life is not math. To get more pointy headed about it, math has been described as the one place where classical logic actually works. In other contexts, you can’t really chain inferences more than one or two deep, can’t really use the law of excluded middle. The blue-eyed islanders’ problem can only be seen as a clever math puzzle rather than a question about a hypothetical reality, etc.
For those who don’t understand the above: you’re not missing much, so don’t worry.
Tell that to graph theory.