Feel like if it was another country they’d be sanctions or something already.

    • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I can’t read the article, but I remember reading about this on reddit a long time ago, and I think the general consensus was that while the diesel sub might’ve been dated, it was quieter and thus the US sub had fewer instruments it could rely on for detection.

      Goes to show that sometimes there’s no objective better tool, but different tools excel at different jobs.

    • Dasus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Oh yeah a Swedish sub did a similar thing to the largest US aircraft carrier, iirc. Simulated torpedos ofc but they’re as good as real ones in terms of “we got you”

      Yup.

      https://nationalsecurityjournal.org/how-a-100-million-swedish-submarine-sank-a-6-billion-navy-supercarrier/

      100-mil gotland class sub “sank” a 6.2 billion dollar aircraft carrier.

      We Finns haven’t been allowed to have subs for a while, and I’m army, so I don’t know much about those, but it’s the same principle yeah.

      The American strategy overlooks certain things sometimes. Trusts too much on technology and not enough on training.