pocker_machine@lemmy.world to Showerthoughts@lemmy.world · 16 hours agoWhen robots create robots, we would call them as 'robots' too. By the same logic if God created us, robots are humans according to God.message-squaremessage-square16fedilinkarrow-up111arrow-down125
arrow-up1-14arrow-down1message-squareWhen robots create robots, we would call them as 'robots' too. By the same logic if God created us, robots are humans according to God.pocker_machine@lemmy.world to Showerthoughts@lemmy.world · 16 hours agomessage-square16fedilink
minus-squaresquaresinger@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·15 hours agoThat point quickly devolves into “What would a hypothetical being that’s completely different from us and not knowable do?” Or to put it differently: “What would something we can’t understand be like?” It’s kind of a moot question to ask since the question already defines that there is no answer.
minus-squarepocker_machine@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·12 hours agoInteresting. Yes we are reducing the not knowable to knowable, which is moot.
That point quickly devolves into “What would a hypothetical being that’s completely different from us and not knowable do?”
Or to put it differently: “What would something we can’t understand be like?”
It’s kind of a moot question to ask since the question already defines that there is no answer.
Interesting. Yes we are reducing the not knowable to knowable, which is moot.