qaz@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 3 天前We don't talk about IPv5lemmy.worldimagemessage-square188fedilinkarrow-up1926arrow-down131
arrow-up1895arrow-down1imageWe don't talk about IPv5lemmy.worldqaz@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 3 天前message-square188fedilink
minus-squareDr. Moose@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up24arrow-down2·3 天前This is exactly why ipv6 was never widely adopted. There’s too much power in a limited IP pool.
minus-squareDomi@lemmy.secnd.melinkfedilinkarrow-up11·3 天前Define “widely”. According to Google 46.09% of their traffic is IPv6 and most servers support it. It’s mostly large ISPs dragging their feet.
minus-squarejumping_redditor@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 天前I’ve never seen functional ipv6 except at university, and I would only consider gci large in terms of coverage area and price.
minus-squareAnUnusualRelic@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 天前I think it’s just a few domestic US ISPs. The rest of the world has been happily using it for quite some time.
This is exactly why ipv6 was never widely adopted. There’s too much power in a limited IP pool.
Define “widely”.
According to Google 46.09% of their traffic is IPv6 and most servers support it. It’s mostly large ISPs dragging their feet.
I’ve never seen functional ipv6 except at university, and I would only consider gci large in terms of coverage area and price.
I think it’s just a few domestic US ISPs. The rest of the world has been happily using it for quite some time.