He risked his neck. When Edward Snowden chose to expose the U.S. National Security Agency (NSA)'s mass surveillance Leviathan, and that of its British counterpart, GCHQ, 10 years ago, he put his life on the line. And he has always declared he has never regretted it. But years after his act of extraordinary courage, the Snowden archive remains largely unpublished. He trusted in journalists to decide what to publish. In an article published in June 2023, by Guardian Pulitzer prize winner Ewen MacAskill - who flew to Hong Kong with Glenn Greenwald and Laura Poitras to meet Edward Snowden - McAskill confirmed that most of the archive has not been made public. "In the end, we published only about 1 percent of the document,” he wrote. What does the 99 percent of the Snowden archive contain? A decade on, it remains shrouded in secrecy. A doctoral thesis by American investigative journalist and post-doctoral researcher Jacob Appelbaum has now revealed unpublished information from the Snowden archive. These revelations go back to a decade but they remain of indisputable public interest: the NSA listed Cavium, an American semiconductor company marketing Central Processing Units (CPUs) - the main processor in a computer which runs the operating system and applications - as a successful example of a "SIGINT enabled" CPU vendor. Cavium, now owned by Marvell said it does not implement back doors for any government. · the NSA compromised lawful Russian interception infrastructure, SORM. The NSA archive contains slides showing two Russian officers wearing jackets with a slogan written in Cyrillic: "you talk, we listen". The NSA and/or GCHQ has also compromised "Key European LI [lawful interception] systems. · among example targets of its mass surveillance program, PRISM, the NSA listed the Tibetan government in exile.
A decade after Snowden exposed NSA’s mass surveillance in cooperation with the British GCHQ, only about 1 percent of the documents have been published, but three major facts can finally be revealed thanks to a doctoral thesis in applied cryptography by Jacob Appelbaum.
But then they couldn’t ask him questions about it before he arrived…but maybe they did and his sell out happened way up the line. In any case, if you think what Trump did was wrong this was the same crime.
You are not in charge of deciding the morality of law. We have courts that decide such matters. What you’re really saying is that your feelings about a law is more important than the law itself.
Come on. Snowden coughed up every thing he had in the first 48 hours. It was his rent.
So what? Once it went to a few news organizations, the Russians probably already had it by the time he arrived.
But then they couldn’t ask him questions about it before he arrived…but maybe they did and his sell out happened way up the line. In any case, if you think what Trump did was wrong this was the same crime.
I don’t think that whistleblowing is a crime.
There are rules to being designated a whistle-blower and he didn’t follow them.
He did actually try to go through those channels, unsuccessfully, so he was left with no other choice.
That’s a far cry from storming the capitol after losing the election to build an even further right state.
What matters to me is the morality of a rule (unreasonable searches, accepting loss), not the fact that a rule was broken.
He didn’t get what he wanted so decided to brake the law. Does sound like Trump.
What matters to me is the morality of a rule (unreasonable searches, accepting loss), not the fact that a rule was broken.
You are not in charge of deciding the morality of law. We have courts that decide such matters. What you’re really saying is that your feelings about a law is more important than the law itself.