

Seems like business as usual for the United States. Starting wars in the Middle East, shitting on South America, and stealing elections at home. Most of that has bipartisan support. None of it is unprecedented even just within my lifetime.


Seems like business as usual for the United States. Starting wars in the Middle East, shitting on South America, and stealing elections at home. Most of that has bipartisan support. None of it is unprecedented even just within my lifetime.


What part of “vote in rigged election” is a “viable” strategy?


They are separate clauses in that sentence. Please learn to read.


ok well, the people who use github and write programs are probably a lot more likely to have experience with claude than you are so they probably didn’t make the same assumptions you did!


Because most people have at least tried these products and it’s not like the agent is being hidden away. It makes commits to your repo using its name as the author (for now).
Do you assume anyone who knows something you don’t has no life? Strange way to live.


cpython is the reference implementation of the python interpreter. The person who took this screenshot has the Claude user on GitHub blocked so that whenever it contributed to a git repo you see this warning. The Claude user is an AI agent. AI code is garbage.


Didn’t he very publicly advertise he would pay people to vote republican? I seem to remember this happening during the campaigning and nobody did shit about it then. Why would the result be any different now when the only politicians who nominally oppose the “destruction of democracy” didn’t do shit about that either and no longer have any power?


deleted by creator
Im sorry dude but if your argument is reddit and stackoverflow are the basis for being “better than what the majority of people can manage” then I just have to respectfully disagree.
AI doesn’t produce data suitable for training AI. It’s a huge problem when AI generated slop makes its way into the training set because it generally degrades the quality of the model. Like a photocopy of a photocopy.
So where is all the data its trained on to surpass most people come from? Do you think they’re curating what they feed it based on IQ scores or something? Verifying accuracy, competency, etc? Or are you aware they just turn on the reddit/stackoverflow/github/etc. scrapers and start pumping them full of unfiltered 100% pure grade A internet bullshit?
if the majority of people were incapable of meeting the standard of AI, then AI wouldn’t have enough data to train on to be better than the majority. it’s a lossy database of things that already exist, it cannot create novelty or surpass its training set.


“So they just sit here and eventually someone brings them food?”


Yeah of course they matter, thanks for making really weird assumptions about my morals based on a domain name you fucking weirdo. Do they justify supporting any given country invading them is the question here. I don’t think there’s a number that could get me to support that but it seems like you have one you’re just not willing to name it. So far it’s narrowed down between 6 and 36000.


So you don’t currently feel it would be justified to overthrow the US government over what happened in MN? Interesting.
Edit: so what’s the threshold here? How many they gotta execute in the streets for you to support Iran bringing freedom to the American people?


He had the x.com domain name purchased back then, too. A loser for the entirety of his life.


Imagine if Iran sent planes loaded with bombs to the US because of the MN protestors getting killed.


He almost got himself and Peter Thiel killed by crashing a $1m car while trying to show off for Thiel. He got kicked out of PayPal for nearly bankrupting the company and insisting that they switch all their servers from Unix to windows for no fucking reason.
So yeah, he’s always been like this.
Someone once said the bottom to me nearly verbatim for questioning the Iraq war. My grandmother once asked me if I wanted to go to hell because I laughed at Bush Jr fumbling his words.
We’ve been there for a lot longer than people are willing to admit.
There have already been extremely obvious attempts to steal US elections. The guy in charge right now tried to lead one. Some were even successful. People weren’t rioting in the street or overthrowing the government when Bush got handed the election by the supreme court, and that’s a much more recent precedent that refers to a successful steal, rather than a failed one.
Did anyone who tried to rig this one election 80 years ago face consequences? Were any measures taken by those in power to prevent another attempt?