Nailed it. https://fedia.io/m/[email protected]/t/1440414/-/comment/8213226
Nailed it. https://fedia.io/m/[email protected]/t/1440414/-/comment/8213226
I get the joke, assuming you’re being tongue in cheek, but when that ambiguity still remains, one’s location is still not given. Hemisphere is a subset of all locations, so superfluous information. But yeah, I was just kidding around.
Difficult to identify one’s location without giving away the hemisphere.
I will always blame DWS, Clinton, and to a slightly lesser extent Brazile for the ruin of the party. Until there is proportional representation (i.e. never), there will never be a party that represents a great many of us.
deleted by creator
Do you really use it or are you just adding an alternative to the conversation? It is an interesting concept (commutation) but not likely to supplant git.
The same two comments every single time he is shared. … but yeah, no-captions gang here.
Strange times that your comment is both wrong and perfectly sensible.
I’m not saying what they’ll do but the concept of the French being “revolutioned out” borders on comical. It may be beheadings or merely stacking trash in the street, but they aren’t known for staying quiet.
Single combat?
It does mean something. It may not have enforcement teeth, as it is a strictly diplomatic body. However, it still illustrates the state of things and has an impact on international relations.
Only kind of. That’s a backronym.
Got to have that high thread count, burst rate throughout. Does it have the cooled bobbin?
deleted by creator
🎶 Iiiinn west Philippine Sea born and raised.
I feel like you are neither fully appreciating the scope of the control exerted over them nor the scale of the distances and hostility of terrain. I understand the sentiment, but what you’re suggesting is essentially tantamount to suicide. That may itself have merit, but call it what it is.
I also think of The Ultimate Showdown too when I see this.
I had forgotten about Macromedia. I liked Dreamweaver before Adobe got its hands on it.
It doesn’t mean that. Your inability or refusal to read a dictionary is your issue to deal with. I’ve lead you to the information. Now you just sound like a flat earther.
Every place that has ever been settled, has been settled at least once without inhabitants. You can use low order logic to arrive at that conclusion. But you don’t need to, as you are alive in the 21st century and seem to have access to the internet. Just go look at a dictionary. It is the only thing relevant here because a word’s definition is the only thing about which I have made assertions. If you are arguing connotative implications, I’ve already made it clear I have no issue with that.
If you just like to argue nonsense positions to hear your keyboard clack, cool. Have fun with that.
I did and I actually get that you were essentially making the same joke to which I replied. I still thought it was funny that the wording matched.