Open models will be pretty good for the average person once the market is flooded with cheap GPUs from all the bankrupt AI companies.

Either the US does it and can at least keep an eye on the program, or another country helps them and it’s the same situation just worse.

Looks good too

Sounds pretty good. If they release a Windows client it might be the first real Discord alternative (assuming calling and screensharing is actually decent)

Easier to just host an .ics file with all the events in some website and let everyone use whatever calendar app they like.

Good/bad content is the same whether it’s AI or not, plus those using AI would probably just lie and say it’s not AI.

Using NearLink as a name for something networking related is a good way to make sure Huawei sends you a nice letter the second you get big enough.

If by “open registration” you mean that anybody with your domain name can just go and create an account with no extra verification, then that’s interesting. Good to know.

Element X requires MAS for registration by design, but login is whatever for now. They’re very adamant about making the app MAS-centric.

Also, open registration will get your instance banned from matrix.org homeserver afaik. Probably not an issue if you don’t plan to federate with them, but worth noting.

On Matrix, as long as you have your username and password, it’s not possible to get “locked out” due to not having your keys. In fact, your keys are only necessary if you plan to participate in encrypted chats, in which case it’s obvious that losing your key will mean losing access to old messages. However, you will still be able to receive new messages by generating a new key.

I use MediaMTX. You can stream to it with whatever (I use OBS). You could even publish it to a website behind an iframe.

Unless you actively support Mozilla, they could not care less about your boycott.

under a 1944 Treaty

Yeah, looks like February was sanctions to the whole ICC and this is a different one targeting Guillou.

Isn’t this old news from like February l?

You have a higher chance of solving this issue if you ask in #webrtc:matrix.org

Tags are locked to a specific commit. So you won’t be able to create a different release with the same tag. Even deleting the repo and creating a new one won’t allow you to reuse the same tag, unless you change the repo name.

Immutable releases include protection against repository resurrection attacks. Even if you delete a repository and create a new one with the same name, you cannot reuse tags that were associated with immutable releases in the original repository.

https://docs.github.com/en/code-security/supply-chain-security/understanding-your-software-supply-chain/immutable-releases

This is just blatantly false. The US is a fascist state.

This is actually insane. Why would you want a visa to visit a fascist state? I guess they applied for a visa just to have it and never use it? You don’t know what fascism is. You have never seen fascism and should be grateful you haven’t experienced the horror of an actual fascist state.

The govt is deliberately destroying the US and they know full well anyone against fascism is not trying to destroy the US.

How exactly are these people with revoked visas anti fascist?

The US is no longer politically about the nuance of belief between right and left, but about fascism and anti fascism.

It’s been like that since the early 2000s (it used to be nazi and anti nazis, but I guess they realized how stupid that was and downgraded it to fascism), funny how that works.

By the way, all of this fascism stuff is unrelated to the topic at hand (both the US and Australia have the right to deny entry based on just not liking what you said), so I’m not sure why you even brought it up.

Saying Charlie Kirk was a piece of shit who literally got what he asked for is very different from Candace Owens attempting to spread fascism to Australia.

Different things (I’ll assume you are right that Owens is a fascist because I don’t care enough to check)? Yes. Are both of them grounds for denial of entry? Also yes.

That’s almost like saying landing on the moon or Mars or the Sun are the same because the craft isn’t landing back on Earth.

Cool example, but that didn’t even make sense.

There is a heck of a lot of difference between a working commentator being held to account (in a country that doesn’t have the same free speech rules anyway for anyone) and holding a vacationer to the same when they are not earning an income from their comments and the country does say that political speech is free speech as a major component of their Constitution.

The US Constitution doesn’t apply to visa holders outside the US.

I’m not sure if you are arguing that the US no longer has a Constitution that applies

If you can quote me saying that, yes. Otherwise I don’t know why you even typed that.

or that you ignorantly thought Australia had the same Constitution as the US.

Never thought or said that. And like I said before, I actually support both decisions so I obviously think it’s legal under Australian law, as well as under US law.

Theft of a can of beans is not equal to theft of a nuclear sub. Sure, they both “boil down to the same scenario”; theft. But I think we can all agree that the same punishment for both would be imbecilic.

Welcome to the real world, where consequences are different depending on where you are. Australia is not the baseline for what should result in denial of entry, and neither is the US. They both have the right to deny entry for just for not liking your name, let alone not liking what you said.

The difference with this thread’s scenario is that yes, they both result in the same thing, but for different reasons. Denial of entry to someone who wasn’t tactful about the boss’ friend who was a hateful bigot is not the same as denial of entry for attempting to weaponise division to destroy a country.

Except that Owens is not trying to destroy Australia, but that’s how you and the Australian government interpret it. Guess what? The US government thinks those people are trying to destroy the US. All that matters is that Australia doesn’t like what Owens said to deny entry, and all that matters is the US didn’t like what was said about Kirk to deny entry.