No one’s asking nor wondering why you find looking at things in the sky beautiful.
They’re asking why you’re ascribing meaning to an arbitrary number of days. Months aren’t subjective, they’re arbitrary.
No one’s asking nor wondering why you find looking at things in the sky beautiful.
They’re asking why you’re ascribing meaning to an arbitrary number of days. Months aren’t subjective, they’re arbitrary.
What to know about blue supermoons:
Post title is misleading as he’s not really the one causing the drama.
it’s simply false to say he’s continuing to cause the drama and problems when all he did was ask to get his commit access back …
No. When he realised he wasn’t immediately given access as he was asking for it he also made a post on the unmoderated reddit board with “Drama” in the title.
He inflamed drama during what should have been an otherwise fairly dull bureaucratic process, tried to hide his earlier posts, was called out on it with a timeline, then eventually half-admitted to creating drama.
… and tell his haters they’re being assholes
Engaging with haters is creating more drama, which makes more disruption, which makes more haters, repeat ad infinitum.
He just needed to ignore them and let the mods do their job, not make their job harder than it already was.
The drama comes from people who just hate the guy and are screaming about letting him back. His response to that was then very cordial and just calling out them for being to aggressive.
It definitely appeared cordial on his part, but the timelines of events comment showed he was cherrypicking and trying to change things after the fact. He was being deceitful and manipulative which of course made everything worse than it needed to be. He drove away more of the community.
All he needed to do was not be disruptive himself, let the mods sort out the initial haters, and let the boring topic of a commit bit be addressed.
Looking back at history, it would lead to more propaganda and more support for going to war.
A population getting attacked only leads to that population wanting to an us vs them mentality and emotional knee-jerk reactions over rational responses.
Because: “The dose makes the poison”.
In other words, any chemical—even water and oxygen—can be toxic if too much is ingested or absorbed into the body. The toxicity of a specific substance depends on a variety of factors, including how much of the substance a person is exposed to, how they are exposed, and for how long.
This was 4 days ago, I didn’t have to look very far:
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2024/apr/27/google-project-nimbus-israel
Firing talent is a great way to bork a project.
As an outsider looking in, it looks like it’s a bit of a wipe the slate clean governance and moderation wise as voted on by the community.
So, now over the coming days the community will in essence vote on whether they will allow sponsorships from the military industrial complex.
For anyone downvoting this who didn’t understand the reference:
Russia is saying that they’re the ones shooting down their own planes, because they don’t want to admit that Ukraine has the capability to shoot down their planes.
Your question:
what things did the LHC discover that have real practical applications right now other than validating some hypothesis
Is really multiple questions:
Is doing fundamental research with no application in mind useful?
Has the LHC led to practical applications usable today
The answer to question 1 is yes.
There’s different types of research programs made to target different goals. Some aim for short or medium term applications, and others are just pure fundamental research.
Just because pure research doesn’t have an application in mind, doesn’t mean it’s not useful. The application isn’t the goal, the expansion of our knowledge base is. Everyone who ever thought up of an application for something did so based on their own knowledge base. If the knowledge base never expands, then we run out of applications to think up. This is why pure research is useful.
And all of history supports this:
The answer to question 2 is also yes:
The obvious ones are:
I have yet to be given an example of something a “general” intelligence would be able to do that an LLM can’t do.
Presenting…
Something a general intelligence can do that an LLM can’t do:
Play chess: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kvTs_nbc8Eg
Why can’t it play it? Because LLM’s don’t have memory, so they can’t work with logic. They are the same as the little “next word predictor” in your phone’s keyboard. It just says what it thinks is the most probable next word based on previous words, it’s not actually thinking or understanding anything. So instead, we get moves that don’t make sense or are completely invalid.
Did you purge and update your filters?
Note: I’m not talking about turning filters off then back on, I’m talking about updating the version of each filter itself.
“the means” in this case would be authoritarian repression.
“The means” always has to be something bad for the “ends” to try and justify reaching for “the means”.
I had no popus using uBlock Origin on Firefox
Also, you can buy Tic Tacs from any newsagent or gas station.
What about OkLCH?
I can’t see your comment about heavy dev and testing.
I’m curious about what exactly is chewing up that much RAM. Do you have a ridiculous amount of containers running? Or a big ram disk or something?
What are you doing that makes having 64gb ram useful?
It wasn’t the profits or ads that got in the way.
It was the security that got in the way. (remember the whole TPM module thing?)
Iterating the version number was just a convenient excuse to throw more ads, and tracking in.
That’s 41 degrees for everyone who doesn’t measure things in bird per gun.