This is why we need 3, 4, or even 5 monitors at a time.

Forever young…

Damn, I didn’t know that!

Huh, that’s the first time I’ve heard of this. I like IPFS, but I do wish it was just a bit… Smoother to use?

I’m not sure I understand, what’s wrong with this commit?

I kinda wondered the same thing, but I guess that’s their choice. Wish they had push some kind of notice to the app to let users know to try the new version. As it is, this is the first time I heard of this.

Yeah, this meme is now very dead for me as well. xD

I learned something today… and I’m not better off for having learned it. What a dumb ass virtue signal to use on something.

Oh hey, nice to see this fork expanded a lot since I last looked at it!

Wanted patent protections for myself mostly. I know the Apache 2.0 is best well-known for that, but I tend to prefer the simplicity of the BSD licenses. More so curious why the BSD 2-Clause was chosen for that Patent clause and not the BSD 3-Clause. Just seems odd to me. I updated my original post with more info.

You are correct, yeah. I updated my post with more info on what I was asking about, plus the text of the two licenses.

It’s honestly remarkable how few people in the comments here seem to get the joke.

Never stop dissecting things, y’all.

Well, by that logic, if they shut down, the the next largest will be targeted, and then the next largest, etc. That’s not a winning game for anyone involved…

I mean, that could happen to any other Lemmy instance too, unfortunately. And even if you do decentralize, a server going down still deprives the rest of us of that content, so it’s never not going to cause some issues. So I wouldn’t hold this against Lemmy.world.

Infinity too.

They said themselves the issue isn’t signups or server capacity, it’s that they’ve been under multiple rounds of DDoS attacks.

Yes

Meanwhile…