Thanks, I’ll try that!
Sure. I import the certificates like this:
{ config, pkgs, inputs, ... }:
{
security.pki.certificateFiles = [
./certificates/home.pem
];
}
where home.pem
is a default PEM formatted certificate. It works fine to import the cert system wide this way.
If I enter the flake.nix and run a simple curl
against the remote server I get the following, which is typical for a TLS certificate error.
curl https://webpage.home
curl: (35) OpenSSL/3.0.14: error:16000069:STORE routines::unregistered scheme
So it seems to me that the development shell does not pick up the certificates installed on the system. I can work around that by using an impure shell, but I think that this is not how nix should be used.
Thanks for the response. You are right, the config was at the wrong path. Unfortunately, the config itself does not work, too. After a bit of testing around this worked for me:
apiVersion: v1
kind: PersistentVolume
metadata:
name: nix-cache-volume
spec:
capacity:
storage: 500Gi
storageClassName: manual
accessModes:
- ReadWriteOnce
hostPath:
path: "/mnt/k8s/nix-cache" # Needs exists before PV is created!
persistentVolumeReclaimPolicy: Retain
---
apiVersion: v1
kind: PersistentVolumeClaim
metadata:
name: nix-cache-pvc
spec:
accessModes:
- ReadWriteOnce
storageClassName: manual
resources:
requests:
storage: 500Gi
---
apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: Deployment
metadata:
name: nix-cache
spec:
replicas: 1
selector:
matchLabels:
app: nix-cache
template:
metadata:
labels:
app: nix-cache
name: nix-cache
spec:
volumes:
- name: nix-cache-storage
persistentVolumeClaim:
claimName: nix-cache-pvc
- name: nix-cache-config
configMap:
name: nix-cache-config
containers:
- name: nix-cache
image: nginx:1.27.0
ports:
- containerPort: 80
volumeMounts:
- name: nix-cache-storage
mountPath: /data
- name: nix-cache-config
mountPath: /etc/nginx/nginx.conf
subPath: nginx.conf
readOnly: true
resources:
limits:
memory: "512Mi"
cpu: "300m"
requests:
memory: "256Mi"
cpu: "200m"
---
apiVersion: v1
kind: Service
metadata:
name: nix-cache
spec:
selector:
app: nix-cache
ports:
- protocol: TCP
port: 80
targetPort: 80
---
apiVersion: networking.k8s.io/v1
kind: Ingress
metadata:
name: nix-cache-ingress
annotations:
traefik.ingress.kubernetes.io/router.tls: "true"
spec:
rules:
- host: "nix-cache.raspi.home"
http:
paths:
- pathType: Prefix
path: "/"
backend:
service:
name: nix-cache
port:
number: 80
tls:
- secretName: nix-cache-raspi-home-tls
hosts:
- "nix-cache.raspi.home"
---
apiVersion: cert-manager.io/v1
kind: Certificate
metadata:
name: nix-cache.raspi.home
spec:
commonName: nix-cache.raspi.home
dnsNames:
- "nix-cache.raspi.home"
secretName: nix-cache-raspi-home-tls
issuerRef:
name: ca-issuer
kind: ClusterIssuer
---
apiVersion: v1
kind: ConfigMap
metadata:
name: nix-cache-config
data:
# See: https://www.channable.com/tech/setting-up-a-private-nix-cache-for-fun-and-profit
nginx.conf: |
events {
worker_connections 1024;
}
http {
proxy_cache_path /data/nginx/cache max_size=500G keys_zone=cache_zone:50m inactive=365d;
proxy_cache cache_zone;
proxy_cache_valid 200 365d;
proxy_cache_use_stale error timeout invalid_header updating http_500 http_502 http_504 http_403 http_404 http_429;
proxy_ignore_headers X-Accel-Expires Expires Cache-Control Set-Cookie;
proxy_cache_lock on;
server {
listen 80;
server_name nix-cache.raspi.home;
location /nix-cache-info {
return 200 "StoreDir: /nix/store\nWantMassQuery: 1\nPriority: 41\n";
}
location / {
proxy_set_header Host $proxy_host;
proxy_pass https://cache.nixos.org;
}
}
}
The config is an adaption from this blog post: https://www.channable.com/tech/setting-up-a-private-nix-cache-for-fun-and-profit
That worked! Thank you! The trick is really to embed the bookmarks into each other :)
Thanks for the reply. When I disable the toolbar, the bookmarks are correctly placed in a folder but the folder is not visible in the toolbar anymore. So I can either have the bookmarks separately in the toolbar, or in a folder but not in the toolbar. The combination of both seems to be only possible if I move the bookmarks by hand in the UI :/
Thanks for the response. I’ll have a look at it. It still astonishes me that there is no off-the-shelf solution to such a trivial and common use case.
The runtime is even called “common language runtime” (clr), as it is intended to support many different languages, which the jvm never was.
As mentioned on Mastodon (https://mastodon.social/@[email protected]/113460954769241417) there seems to be no way to do it at the moment :(