In many cases it’s both.

Most western legal systems work in this way: there are two separate domains of law: criminal law and civil law. Explained in a very simplified way:

Criminal law is about people having done wrong things to society as a whole. Prosecuting crimes is the job of the state (prosecutor) and not (usually) of the victim. People who do things that are defined as crimes may be imprisoned, or they may be fined (forced to pay money to the state). There are also crimes that do not directly have victims, but you can still be fined or imprisoned for committing them. Most offenses against traffic law are like that, e.g. who is the victim of someone driving too fast…?

Civil law is about how people treat each other. More specifically, tort law is about people doing wrong things to each other. If a person has harmed another person (even if it wasn’t a criminal offense, which may have higher standards of proof or intention), the victim can sue the offender in a civil court in order to collect damages. But that requires the victim taking action; neither you nor the state can usually take civil action against someone who didn’t harm you, only someone else.

In some legal systems it’s possible that those things can be combined to some extent, for example someone convicted of a crime may also be ordered to pay damages to the victim at the same time. In others they are completely separate.

I was thinking of geizhals.at which is usually where I go first when I need to buy anything online. Sometimes Amazon is the cheapest option, and then I buy from Amazon, but many times something else is!

Amazon’s monopoly has made it so hard to find alternative online stores to buy a lot of stuff

Where in the world do you live? Don’t you have price comparison websites with a lot of different online stores? We do for my country.

I think most children aren’t very interested in most art that isn’t made specifically for children.

Science meanwhile, there are a lot of ways to make that interesting to many children, with interactive elements and such.

More generally I think this https://www.astralcodexten.com/p/moderation-is-different-from-censorship is a good way to think about things like this.

It does.

Well, ok, if all OP wanted to know is what a copyright license is:

By default, copyright law in most countries prohibits anyone except the author or other copyright holder from distributing creative works, including software, even in modified form. There are a few exceptions to this, but this is the general rule.

A license is a document that the copyright holder agreed to that grants someone permission to do so anyway.

In the context of open source, such a license needs to meet certain conditions to be considered open source. Among other things it needs to allow anyone (not just specific licensees) to distribute the software for any purpose, even in modified form.

The community is called “no stupid questions”, not “completely unclear questions”. I genuinely have no idea what you want to know. 🤨

“without exaggeration”

I use Arch speak Esperanto btw

Yes, of course I’m talking about spoken language. Of course if English were written in kanji we would need fewer characters to express the same information, but it wouldn’t change the spoken language at all.

(I remember learning the following graphical user interface design rule: switch your application to Spanish or Portuguese to check whether UI messages still fit in the boxes you’ve put them in. Spanish and Portuguese are the common languages that need the most characters per unit of information.)

There already are plenty of conlangs (constructed languages). The main thing that differentiates them from natural languages is the fact that their grammar generally doesn’t have any exceptions (irregular verbs or nouns). It would be possible to create such a language based on the grammar and vocabulary of English.

The only conlang I’m proficient in is Esperanto, which definitely works very well for practical communication. One cool feature about Esperanto is the system of prefixes and suffixes that acts as a vocabulary shortcut, for example the word for “cold” is just “un-warm” (varma / malvarma), or the word for “school” is just “learning-place” (lerni / lernejo). The language you’re imagining would likely also consist of words like “unwarm” and “learnery”.

Meanwhile I don’t think the length of (root) words needs to be especially short. Studies have found that all languages transmit information at approximately the same rate, which is why Spanish with its relatively long words seems to be spoken so fast. Human brain capacity is a limiting factor for things like that.

Hint: photo and video evidence has only been a thing for less than 200 years when photos and videos were invented. So if humanity managed without it before that, it can do so again.

There actually was a diesel ICE for some time too: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ICE_TD

Entering “artificial intelligence” in my instance’s community search gave me a few like: [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]

There is also one in German: [email protected]

Certainly not, just look at [email protected] for some examples of things unlikely to have been said ever before. (The non-federated link aggregation website has a busier version of that.)

Do you really think that you will get better answers on non-topical questions from these chatbots than from generic LLMs that are free to use anyway?

because when I wrote the above comment, around 80% or 90% of my lemmy homepage was just your posts, which felt kinda spammy

Guess not, outside of sentences like this one. 😉

bro are you just mass-crossposting things from reddit or what? Those camel case titles aren’t really common here, you know.