Only if you get those responsibilities by staying in the same company rather than getting hired in the same role by another one

lol prolly

Yep

This is so cool

Ooh. Good catch!

Probably 😂

That’s a good question. My instinct would be to say that they’re worried about importing radicalized Palestinians, but I don’t know that the ideology of those radicals would be too different than the people living in Egypt, at least not different enough that it would spark violence.

I think you can technically still use Pebble on iOS, but I’m not sure how. The previous owner of the watch has been using it with his iPhone 13.

Ah, interesting. I did not know this! But I had thought that the concern with the EV car fires was mostly because the cars can set fire unexpectedly, they are hard to contain, and carry more hazardous fumes than a traditional vehicle, not that they catch fire more often.

I hear that their cars are nice. I would buy one if they made a plug-in hybrid.

I don’t think it’s that bad. But it’s a shame how unfriendly EVs are for the environment, the whole process is borderline worse than using fossil fuels when you consider emissions as well as potential fire hazards and poor disposability

I love the Pebbles. I have a Pebble Time, just snagged a used Pebble Time Round 20mm from eBay so I’m looking forward to trying that out!

Yep. This seems like a fair enough modern replacement though if that battery life is accurate.

You’re the one who said this, no?

https://lemmy.world/comment/3783147

Just checking.

Guilt by association is widely accepted as an ad hominem fallacy

https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/logicalfallacies/Ad-Hominem-Guilt-by-Association

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem#Guilt_by_association

https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Association_fallacy

It still is. You can commit to the ad hominem (guilt by association) fallacy by saying that the arguments are bad because extremists believe them or point out logical fallacies in the arguments and say that they must be false because they’re logically invalid.

Focusing on one or the other should suffice for an argument though. Although you can’t do both because the latter is an ad hominem fallacy

Why do you want to debate your husband about Rogan’s talking points if you yourself are having trouble arguing with them?

Tox doesn’t collect any data at all, as far as I know. It’s purely P2P.

I go to news sites and add “/feed” or “/rss” to the URL.