Ouch 😵‍💫

I’m not sure either, but both instances are italicised in the article itself. Perhaps it’s defined in the full book?

No, I just don’t want to explain to someone who’s clearly just baiting. But you do you and pay 3x as much because it’s made in america.

Vibes.

It’s just jingoistic drivel, same as all of Trump’s China crap. Implying the phone has better privacy because it’s made in the US.

The implication that Chinese-made goods are less private. Also I’m pretty sure most people speculate that the Trump phone is just a rebranded one of these? Guess we’ll just have to wait and see.

I did too, so, thanks, now I’m cackling at this racist bullshit:

I think you’re seeing the wrong causation when it comes to enshittification. FOSS licenses prevent that sort of thing from happening. Linux is already, by far and away, the most popular server OS so consumers moving to it isn’t going to make it worse.

I dunno, maybe be less of a hipster bestie?

It’s only been flown for nine years?

Edit: Wait, I figured out that the monument has only existed for nine years so that makes more sense. Feel like the article could have worded it as “since the monument opened” or “since the monument’s first pride month”.

Yes, but most people trade their phones in after two to three years.

But is it better than someone else getting use out of the phone for several more years? Because that’s what I’m suggesting, and it seems you’re arguing against a strawman…

It’s the same as trading in a car versus selling it on the private market. It is ALWAYS a bad deal. It’s also not like if you trade it in that’s more environmentally friendly, because they just recycle it immediately, and most of the carbon emissions come from manufacture. They’re just trying to inflate prices by killing the second-hand market.

If you’re that worried about your data, screen who you’re selling it too. But unless you’re a journalist, politician or very high up in a business, you’re probably fine.

Release your models under a license that requires the printer that prints it to be open source.

Then you wouldn’t be releasing your models under a free and open source license. It’s that simple really. The only restriction that is universally agreed to be FOSS is the GPLs requirement to release any modifications under the same license. But you can still commercialise and run the software on whatever machine you want, for example a Windows device.

I was gonna say, that MEP calling Canada the “most European country outside Europe” when they haven’t even competed in Eurovision!

Oi! How dare you call me out like this,

It is when you use a private tracker and disable DHT, Local Peer Discovery and Peer Exchange.

Yeah it’s a little strange. Swift is Apple’s own programming language, and there was an older Jellyfin app on iOS that didn’t use it and so wasn’t fully “native” in a similar way to how most social media apps are just a web browser.

There is a native Apple TV app, I didn’t migrate from plex until there was and I migrated over 18 months ago. It’s called Swiftfin.

I’m not behind a CGNAT and that’s completely free. I do pay for that IP to be static though, but that’s only ~$6.50/month (USD).

I’d guess they’ll have an Opt-In for Enterprise editions?