no, harm reduction is recognizing the harm is going to come, and mitigating the consequences. it’s not voting for someone who might only cause some harm.

voting is not harm reduction

I voted for the fascists because the Democrats were heading towards fascism

no one said that. it’s a strawman

or.

if you are sick of being disenfranchised by Democrats

this is all just storytelling. power vacuums are a story telling device, but they are not, actually, observable, testable phenomenon. they are part of a story that is told. often, this is to justify a particular regime taking power.

the hypothesis was decay, not invasion.

they could kill everyone in any society they decide to invade. this isn’t an indictment of anarchism.

all anarchists do is go to organizing meetings. I guarantee you can find one nearby.

there simply isn’t evidence of some causal mechanism by anarchist societies must decay. their hypothesis can’t be proven. I didn’t even know how it could be tested.

humanity was completely unstructured at the beginning

can you cite this?

exarcheia and anabaptist sects come directly to mind, but you’ve just excluded them for some reason. it seems like no-true Scotsman to me.

hierarchy

there are a lot of competing theories. personally, I have begun to favor non-prefigurative models of revolution, so you should probably consult others on what they think they will build after the revolution.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portal%3AAnarchism?wprov=sfla1

power vacuums do not exist in fact. you’re telling a story based on a myth.

what makes you think a community would not keep the means to defend itself and it’s neighbors?

there is no such thing as a power vacuum. it’s just a story telling device.

anarchist society comparable to state

a what?!

another story

they are a story that people tell to explain the world. but they are not a phenomenon that can be empirically tested.

anarchism is a system without rulers. warlords are rulers. ipso facto.

You are not making any sense whatsoever

because youre not qualified to be in this discussion