Ah that explains it. Thanks!
I’m new here and don’t know what to put in my profile. She/them, living in Aotearoa/New Zealand.
Ah that explains it. Thanks!
I thought they had already done it. I got the notification months ago.
The top result is already out. Obviously the John Oliver fans got their wish and Pūteketeke won. Thousands of them had to be disqualified for cheating, though.
We are all waiting now to see who is in second. Fingers crossed for the Fairy Tern, New Zealand’s most endangered bird!
I’ve never used twitter in my life, still have a vague interest in what Musk is doing to it though.
That tracks.
Pretty sure Elon Musk railed against bots on twitter despite having been proven to have used bots on twitter to manipulate opinion himself.
The being baptized part is relevant to converts, and the being a godparent part would have relevance for all transgender catholics.
Apart from my illness support group, I’m only on fediverse social media now, and only via web browser. It’s a breath of fresh air.
I’m realising there are subtle ways that enshittification constrains and shapes actual conversations between us.
We are “social animals” though. It’s normal for the social animals to attempt to regulate what each other does and how they treat others in the group.
You see this in apes, elephants, whales, etc.
Thanks for posting!
I think Medecines Sans Frontiers is good?
Never has the “Just a moment…” snippet view been more apropos.
Yes, it’s a massive level of cringe.
Gmail is convenient, but if it’s about to be filled with 😊 and 👍 then I’ve got to stop using it for any serious communication.
I agree, it is technically true. Sorry if I sounded too nitpicking, I’ve just come back from a week with no internet access /news so for a moment I thought you were talking about all of them doing it during the events of the last few days!
Germany, France and Spain also have killed and kidnapped citizens.
You may wish to rephrase that…
I believe this indicates that the problem with sensitivity is ‘skin deep’
So, if that’s the case it’s to do with your nerves.
If I were you I would explore neurological interventions like botulism toxin/botox injections before jumping straight to surgery.
Yes I had a family member in a right wing conspiracy area. It was infuriating because his friends would tell him their nonsense and he would be skeptical and google it, only for google to seemingly support what they were saying.
I couldn’t replicate his results at all and it would take a lot of searching to even find what he was talking about so I could debunk it for him.
When will people realise that google has tailored algorithms and we are not all experiencing the same search results?
The first thing you’ll see if you search Google for “tank man” right now will not be the iconic picture of the unidentified Chinese man who stood in protest in front of a column of tanks leaving Tiananmen Square, but an entirely fake, AI-generated selfie of that historical event.
No, this is the first thing the author saw. Probably because they are a journalist writing about AI.
When I google tank man I don’t even get the AI image on the first page. The top result is from history.com. If I go to google image search it is the 7th result on the page. The top result is from wikipedia.
It’s just… always been my main browser.
I am so confused.