I got that idea from this design.

Yep, but I made mine first 😬 I believe we were both inspired by the work of Karakurist.

Yes, absolutely. Just needs one motor per digit.

The video exagerates it a bit. But it is audible. Of course the clock will only move once a minute.

It is digital because it has digits instead of pointers. It is also digital in the sense that it has discrete states.

In the cases you describe it should fail by ruining the print, not the build plate though. If there is something between the nozzle and the plate, it will be too far away from it after calibration, not too close.

The Github UX is amazing if you ever had to use gitlab or bitbucket

This project is now on Printables!

There is no snapping, but the geneva drive will stay locked in position when it is not moving. The thing that I haven’t figured out is how to get the 3 to go back to 0 after 23:59, it needs to skip the numbers 4 to 9.

I’m testing a geneva drive (you can see it in the front in the photo), that should allow me to reduce the number of motors even further. I think I can get it down to two, maybe even one.

This video was the inspiration for my project!

Here you go!

Yes! 🤓

Nobody knows if and when programming will be automated in a meaningful way. But once we have the tech to do it, we can automate pretty much all work. So I think this will not be a problem for programmers until it’s a problem for everyone.

When the Apple car is released, the EU will invent 350 kW DC fast charging via USB-C 🙏

It works as long as you don’t call list() within that function.

Haha, I completely missed that it’s a game.

I wonder how often someone walks in and tells them about the mistake. Do the baristas have a standard response?

I agree with your point on biodiversity and yes, climate change poses an existential threat to individual people, but not to civilization as a whole.

No, I’m certain that human civilization would survive.