“This thing happened” is news, so “Trump said this” is news.
“You should have this reaction to it” is for the opinion pages, even if that reaction is “you should believe him”.
That isn’t to say the Times doesn’t try to get away with pushing a narrative while technically following the rules, but that rule is still a good one.
Now I want to watch Coraline.
“You’re good with computers, right?”
I swear these people probably ask their Uber drivers to fix their transmission because they’re “good with cars”.
I think you accidentally the quilt.
That’s a Queen Anne Chonk.
Perhaps she’ll die
Grindr data leak.
Most rural Americans know someone in a city, yet half of them still think those cities are active war zones.
Propaganda can win against anecdotes.
But why the 51st 🤔
Maybe we should build a few dozen silos.
Sure, I’ll take you to a good place!
Heh! Heh! Heh!
But if I ignore the parts I find immoral, and focus on what I personally consider to be good moral lessons, it gives me objective morality!
As long as you don’t brag about your band, you’re still good.
Policies that are implemented through centralized, authoritarian, and undemocratic means can benefit the plurality, and can be more easily implemented when desired by the ruling class.
This is a very different claim from the one you’re trying to see.
Poop
That’s actually a pretty complex question. Are they even capable of conceptualizing their own internal model of themselves as it compares to their species’ gender norms?
Since they’re not social species, I’d be very surprised if they could.
I suspect the person you’re replying to is using “liberal” in a way that refers to someone to the right of their own position. Not in the way Limbaugh used it as a catch-all for anyone left of Reagan.