B-TR3E

This isn’t the US’ war, why would Trump be making any demands?

Because he sees a chance to profit. His war or not, Trump wants his cut. Or else. He’s got a right on his cut because he’s the president. The best president ever. Everybody knows that.

Great plan. Even better than I thought.

Not even in the days of the cold war there was remotely enough bunker capacity for everyone. What for anyway? Want to spend the next 100 or 1000 years in a subterranean hole? Good luck with that. Waste of money and resources but probably just the pipe dreams of some beaurocrat in a mostlly irrelevant institution.

There are no oceans made of sodium and water. There couldn’t even be because sodium and water would react to NaOH and H3O+. There are oceans of water and sodium chlorate because smart people are made from chlorine…

Abilities are a Chinese hoax anyway. Do I have any abilities? Do you? Told you so. Hoax.

Maybe it’s not safe. They might just react like sodium and water, who could tell?

Obviously Austrian terrorist activity (ATA). They secretly want their colony (French Austria) back. Ceterum censeo austriam delendam esse.

Du mich auch.

Some people’s crisis is other people’s chance. Some people just aren’t productive - they can’t shine in a productive or just constructive environment. They are attracted by anything rotten, deeply troubled, just the kind of work where intrigues, brown nosing and opportunism are rewarded and productivity doesn’t count.

deleted by creator

Do you know them? Who’s editor in chief? Can you answer any of the questions I’va asked above? Did you read it?

I didn’t even care about that as much as about their obscurity. But it seems people here are too damned stupid to understand what “obscure” means in case of a news outlet. Makes me wonder a lot less how people are falling for fake/manipulative news or “corporate communications”.

No, exactly that’s what I mean by “obscure”. An investment group is not a publisher nor a news agency, not even a media group.When it comes to publishingh that’s just obscure. It’s almost the definition of an obscure media outlet.

“Obscure” means nebulous, not clearly visible, of unclear origin. So, if you’re arguing their obscurity, who exactly are euronews? What are their sources, who are their correspondents, who’s financing them, what is their business address or business model? I’ve wondered about that quite for a while but there’s nothing to find except their data brokering service which seems good evidence that they are not what they claim to be: a news organization. So what exactly are they if not obscure?

Who the fuck rated euronews “Left-Center” and “High” [credibility]? They’re obscure as fuck. Mostly a tracker/data broker with an AI generated “news” frontend spilling clickbait AI slop never quoting any reliable sources.

Where have I heard that before, mein Führer?

Europoean aristocrats haven’t been actual political leaders for a long time. They’re basically just decoration.

You’re misunderstanding it. Everyone can make a safe deal. The art is fucking it up.

First of all we were talking about parlamentary immunity which is quite different. Secondarily if diplomatic immunity weren’t, diplomacy would be dead. But, I guess you don’t need diplomacy, so it’s a bad thing, anyway.

Would you mind to elaborate? That fact that you think something was “terrible” is not an argument. I think, you don’t really have an idea how immunity actually works. It’s not synonymous to “impunity”.