opeds are different. If the NYT framed the original article as an oped, fine, but it didn’t.

Iran strongly condemns the US’ attacks in Sana’a today and offers condolences to the families of those who were killed. We oppose the US’ reckless missile strikes, which undermine Yemen’s stability,

To some people, the world starts and ends with NATO countries and their enemies.

ASEAN (covering 600 million people) might as well not exist except as it relates to China, nevermind Grenada.

Chinese politicians aren’t given that right. Russian politicians aren’t given that right. What makes this guy different?

RIP John Pilger :(

His work is rather amazing

who cares?

lmao this kind of degeneracy happens everywhere, it’s just usually not policed unless the government wants to make a statement

Good riddance

(yes)

this is why it’s important to see news from multiple perspectives

Japan’s also discussing restarting their nuclear weapons program

Nuclear non-proliferation was a failure

Everyone should want nukes

who even cares about naval assets in a land-based war?

sounds like a waste of missiles that could be used to e.g. fuck with Crimes logistics by taking down the bridge

Another “game-changer”?

why should they care???

There’s also the crap “China will collapse in XX days” propaganda on YouTube as well

It’s fucking everywhere

everyone has massive propaganda departments if they can afford it

it’s so so extremely useful for driving political support

the US even has dedicated “Psychological Operations” divisions in the Army

blame the game, not the player