So it was a mitigated disaster.

Grow up a little, btw.

Jeez how much porn are you backing up.

Why the fuck would anyone buy this. Come on.

You mean SI.

To whom*

That’s a lot of money, isn’t it? Just buy a 4Tb HDD, backup and store somewhere offsite. Will pay of in a year.

Maybe tweak the swappiness?

Heh, Bambu studio just added an experimental setting for doing exactly this :)

What is wrong with my reviews??

Yeah but that requires space, and OP mentions he doesn’t have much.

Comparison to reddit.

Your username confuses me.

So, Claude was given the explanation on its training data. Not hugely surprising.

Must have been hilarious.

Yes A1 mini. I’ll try this. Come to think of it, once or twice I had a warning that the nozzle could have filemant stuck or the build blade being crooked (neither seemed to be the case) but it could potentially be related if the bed probing is not working correctly.

Not sure if such a thing would manifest only on this particular filament die to some tolerance or whatever, but won’t hurt to try anyway.

I have read that the Bambu filaments do not guarantee with same thickness very well compared to other manufacturers (0.03mm instead of 0.02mm tolerance) and this could play a factor with small nozzles. I had in mind to try other manufacturers, but they are not so easily available for similar price in my area, so I have postponed it until I finish my current project, but I am keeping it in mind.

I should probably buy some calipers and actually measure it.

I would guess the z-offset should be fine because for any other filament it works correctly.

I will try to print a test for determining the flow rate for this specific filament after my print is done. I am using the default Bambu settings at the moment, and didn’t have any issue on other filaments so far, but I guess it’s worth checking out.

I’ll try the calibration cube you mention with the specific filament at high and low speed versus another filemant and try to compare the results…

Hmm I read about this in the Bambu wiki now. Seems like it could have been an under-extrusion linked to this. I’ll keep it in mind and fiddle with it next time I get similar behaviour and see if my current setting would have been near the max flow or not.

Kind makes sense because the first layer was nice but the second layer had the issues, and the first layer was printed much slower than the rest.