We should always blame horses first even if there were none involved. The fuckers have been getting off light for too long.

I do wonder what those hideous parking towers could ever be used for. Not an architect so I don’t know but could they ever be converted into anything useful? Like actually useful not car brain useful. If you added walls could they become homes or are they to badly designed to ever house anything living.

Reminder that a covid symptom is seemingly permanent terrible spatial reasoning, people were already terrible drivers but they’re worse than ever now.

https://www.brainfacts.org/diseases-and-disorders/covid-19/2023/the-risks-of-even-mild-covid19-1-in-4-showing-cognitive-deficits-011723

If you haven’t seen his article please look it’s SO much worse than you are imagining.

Wow that’s way better than I expected. Guess it makes sense Germany would take that sort of thing more seriously.

I’d hope they work but I’ve seen too many “former” nazis get criticized for still holding some terrible views then immediately throw a tantrum and run back to the far-right because they don’t actually want to take accountability they want to get coddled by the same minorities they hurt and be told how clever and brave they are for no longer being bigots.

A huge annoyance was that there was already subs for asking sex questions but people found it easier to karma farm in the main ones so they were barely used. Hopefully without karma here that will be avoided.

Its so frustrating when I see other minorities use that argument because their suicide statistics are also typically higher! That’s the nature of oppression.

I worry this would further class decide in some ways. Where I am all the best green space is in the rich parts of town, the poorer folks need to drive. The little green-space poorer areas do have isn’t as well maintained either. I think this is coming at the problem from the wrong end, this should be the last step not the first.

Ironically, defending arguments using scientific studies and experiments, but not being able to think critically about the methodology used or what the results mean. Too often people will cite scientific literature based off the title and MAYBE skim it. Trying to have a discussion with them will usually result in them calling you anti-science.

A good example is the pseudo-scientific belief common within incel circles that women can store and absorb dna from past sexual partners and that their children can then have more than one genetic father (an excuse to shame sexually active women while fear mongering about cuckoldry). If you track down the source the study actually explicitly explains exactly why this isn’t the case.