The go to answer, unless I misunderstood your requirements, is always a heltec or a rak wisblock.

https://heltec.org/product-category/lora/meshtastic/

https://store.rakwireless.com/products/wisblock-meshtastic-starter-kit?variant=43884034621638

Mmm… I added several IT news, and regular news sites. National and international.

Sometimes feed offenders like reuters don’t work (without workarounds) but the majority offers their all or topic centric feeds just like that.

Just add sites (by top level domain) that you use to read. You would be surprised how many provide feeds and even more surprised how fast your feed reader gets overwhelmingly filled 😅

The project looks nice and RSS Aggregators are the way to go.

I switched to a file based (cloud storage) syncing app like News Explorer a while ago. Sometimes less infrastructure involved is a blessing.

mailbox.org works for me

I’m repeating what was in my German valid, and lawful contract and is part of the law: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gesetz_über_Arbeitnehmererfindungen

That’s what they use to say here, too.

Still inventions and „creations“ while employed have their own law and regulation. I don’t know them in detail, but I understand that it can be fuzzy and complicated.

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arbeitnehmererfindung

Wettbewerbsverbot is yet another issue, when you switch to a competitor.

Say I’m programming fullstack for my employer and start a Web App as hobby. How do I prove that this is not based on training my employer paid for? If it is in a totally unrelated field it would be easier.

My old contract says otherwise. The contract was generous enough to allow me to invent something in totally unrelated fields. Question would be how to proof that the work didn’t enable me to invent that stuff.

Sadly not the way it works, in Germany. The employer can argue that the employment enabled you technically to invent something or to build something (Germany).

EDIT: Emphasized again, that I talk about the situation in Germany. Guys… laws differ in countries and we got a own law that rules on that topic.

Perfect. I thought about some kernel level shenanigans which could be out of influence for third party vendors.

Is this verified, or does it still depend on how the mechanism is implemented?

duply

Offend them all!

The distance and location sure have a huge impact, but actual jammers use so much energy energy compared to the well regulated devices. I’m not sure anything comes through.

A good example is drones or starlink jammed in Ukraine. The drones need to change frequencies regularly as the jammer saturate a set of frequency bands. Starlink on the other hand seems to be run with a frequency hopping mechanism, which is more robust by design.

Different areas of tec and use cases, but the principles are the same.

If the right frequencies are overpowered and saturated nothing/no payload goes through.

Only answer would be the usage of a broader frequency band, but then again cell phone does exactly that and is still jammable.

I installed synapse some weeks ago. Pretty easy, straightforward. Even managed to install some bridges.

After the last matrix.org incident and some info about the failing message retention, I just killed the server again. I’m not comfy with the service being so greedy/resource hungry and also the usability sucks at certain points.

That is the reason Markdown and Git are used for a lot shenanigans these days. Knowledge bases, awesome-lists, documentations. You name it.

If you got the right tools (sphinx, typora, mkdocs, …obsidian) you got a powerful toolchain.

We’re using headings for different types of inventory (hardware/office items/…) and then a block of subheading, bulletpoint combination (serialnumber, date of acquisition, whereabouts,…) for each item and associated item.

The toc is generated automatically and helps browsing through.

This might be an unpopular opinion/solution but even for two small size sister companies we are doing inventory in a version controlled markdown file 🫣