

Do you not understand that the maximum allowed penalty does not signal it is the standard or common penalty? Did you read the article?
Please stop responding with your bullshit 🫰


Do you not understand that the maximum allowed penalty does not signal it is the standard or common penalty? Did you read the article?
Please stop responding with your bullshit 🫰


Pretty much all of these examples included additional crimes such as rape, multiple murders, etc. which was my point
The two that don’t were later overturned.
Did you read the article? Maybe spend more time doing research than writing a comment… Or better yet at least read the comment you are responding to first.
I will soften my position from “ever” because that includes some of the archaic shit the US did in prior centuries. A better articulation is that they have done any recently


There was recently a mother that killed her 3 kids, admitted to it, and was likely going to a mental institute where she would have been able to be released within months. It’s not that uncommon to hear about a college girl that kills her baby shortly after birth as a way to try to escape the reality.
I’m not that informed on the subject but I would be very surprised if death penalty was ever given for a single instance of killing a baby. Death penalty isn’t even legal in many states although that’s a separate controversial issue.


The death penalty isn’t even commonly applied to one-off first degree murder convictions. It normally takes some other factor such as torture or multiple killings to escalate it to death penalty.
Even if you think abortion is murder this is detached from reality.


I’m just so disillusioned with the Dems, I don’t really care anymore. It’s literal nazi’s vs corporate sellouts. They can all get fucked.


Woosh buy also dude has a point


A faceless banbot caught you in their word filter?
It’s death for you.
“If you can replace a semicolon or hyphen with a comma/period, you probably should”. Writing advice I received at age ~10 and it never stopped being relevant in literature contexts


The first time had enough plausible deniability that he meant it in a “See what happens” type of way.
I still think that is the most reasonable interpretation of his statements but he’s intentionally playing into the media to keep the debate going. Letting people hear what they want to hear; Those that want to believe he meant the bad version (either because they like the message; or want to be mad about it) will hear that way. Those that want to believe he meant the innocent version will believe that.
It’s just very sick. What a disgusting terrorist.
I was never that into the open source community, but I did admire it from afar.
I don’t see how anyone would ever contribute to open source now, knowing it will just be thrown into the meat processor.


GPT is basically a machine that builds machines.
We understand how the machine builder works. We don’t understand how the output of the machine works. Like mechanically we understand each individual sub-component works e.g. a single matrix multiplication, but we don’t understand why specific weights are the value they are, or the broader macrostructure.
I don’t think you realize that acting like “No we actually do understand how it works” just reveals that you don’t understand the question, it does not show that the question has an answer.
Please explain what this one specific weight is, and why that value shouldn’t be higher or lower.


It’s just a series of 10 trillion floats. And we don’t really know what the individual floats represent and changing them degrades performance but hey
Technically. It’s just if statements.
Great edit. I love this.


From my perspective this wasn’t a ‘luck’ situation.
A criminal assaulted a crowd of people with explosives. It’s just a coincidence that the criminal is a cop in this case. It’s not ‘unlucky’ that they were assaulted.


You seem to be missing the part where they threw an explosive into a crowd of people.


Ironically Asian powers are the only ones that seem to know what they’re doing these days.
America & European leaders have lost their damn minds
Exactly. The standard QoL between 1800, 1900, and 2000 is immense. But between 1970/80/90/00/10/20 - it all feels extremely similar or even a bit worse. Cars vs Horse was a big change to out QoL, Landline vs iPhone is arguably lateral or only slightly up. And I feel the same can be said for the majority of innovations over the last 30 years… Like they’re nice sure, but they didn’t really revolutionize our QoL like the generation prior to the boomers experienced.
Bomers got it “as good as it got” up to now, but weer able to enjoy the average bull run of the last 50 years. Meanwhile younger generations are entering right as it started to taper off.
The older I get and the more I understand that boomers had literally it the easiest out of any one in history the more salty I get over them calling millennials & gen Z lazy all those years.
All you stupid oldies had to do was put like 2% of your paycheck into any index over your career and you would be rich AF right now. Which, is exactly why so many boomers are fucking loaded right now and old a historically disproportionate amount of wealth for the generation.
Honestly it’s kinda sad, he could have been such an advocate for healthy living and staying sober. He could have fought for treatment for addicts.
Same with hegseth, he gets clowned on for not keeping up with the army members he trains with but, brother in christ, he’s 46 and doesn’t hold a position where physical fitness is relevant.
The two of them could have advocated for keeping your body healthy but instead they had to wrap it in manosphere anti-woke BS