ISP Network Engineer might be something.
It is my current feeling that the blend of physical work to install devices, with the mental work of planning, configuring, documenting, is kind of protecting the field.
Although maybe we are a bit special in my workplace because we don’t have a separation between planners, NOC, and field team. It’s all just the twelve of us, doing bits of everything. Maybe in the big ISPs things are circling the LLM drain as well.
For what, to create another “buffer zone” out of another nations land? After you annexed the last buffer zone - the Golan heights - illegally? Fuck off!
This nazi is still around? What the fuck. I thought his pillows at the 14.88 USD price point would have sealed the deal.
Here’s my old comment where I uploaded screenshots as those prices were live: https://discuss.tchncs.de/post/22420855/13240856
And a second one where I looked through more of their price history: https://discuss.tchncs.de/post/22420855/13240839
I don’t think it makes any sense either:
The only positive is that the energy will be cheap, and that the computers are safe except from nation state actors and untracked space debris.
I lean towards this being a narrative for the markets. Space Exploration Technologies Corp. claimed a 370 billion USD total addressable market (TAM) in space enabled solutions, and a 26.5 trillion USD TAM for AI in their S-1 filing before going public. They state within that their goal over time is to launch 100 gigawatts of compute to space each year.
By making the claim that this would be worthwhile they present themselves as uniquely positioned to profit from this situation. Moreso than other AI compute companies or other rocket launch companies.
By the way, regarding integration, I just learned from a colleague last week that he uses emacs for editing remote files too. You can just open a file as:
/method:user@host:filename, with method being ssh or ftp for example
https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_node/emacs/Remote-Files.html
Deposit at a hotel? I haven’t seen that before.
Isn’t the very definition of a household chore that it’s a recurring task related to cleaning or preparing things at home?
They aren’t allowed to just keep it of course. They will ask you where to transfer the funds
Well we learn to code in the programming language that the teacher choses, not in any natural language at all, so neither English nor our native languages.
But all significant programming languages that I know do have reserved control words that are taken from English. Maybe that is the direction of your question?
Then no, mostly we don’t use specifically crafted or preprocessed programming languages just to have control words recognizable as words in our native languages. We just learn the English-based control words as features of the programming language, if we don’t already recognize them.
As for the variable names and natural language comments embedded in the code, that we create, that varies. I’d say as soon as interlingual collaboration or code sharing is a possibility, people will go for English in my experience. And I suspect that people who have gone for English before tend to stick to English even in their private use.
This is also related to learning materials, documentation of language features and libraries being available to the largest degree in English.
I perceive it as easier to stick to English, rather than to code switch between natural language while I program.
Yes they are very related.
Japanese, Korean and Vietnamese loaned the symbols from China when they began writing their languages. However Japanese uses two moraic writing systems in addition (Hiragana and Katakana), Korean has later switched to a syllabic one (Hangul), and Vietnamese switched to a latin derived alphabet. Those are probably what you recognize as distinct.
Where and when they use or used Chinese symbols the meanings per symbol are or were not consistent in the languages, as separate drifting of meaning and reforms of the writing system occured over a long period.
The symbols are called 漢字 in traditional Chinese and 汉字 in simplified Chinese, the are called 漢字 in Japanese, it used to also be 漢字 in Korean, now in Hangul it is 한자, in Vietnamese it was 漢字 and is now Chữ Hán or Hán tự.
As you can see they used the Chinese name for the Chinese ideograms. But they all say it a little differently. Hànzì in Mandarin, Kanji in Japanese, Hanja in Korean, Chữ Hán or Hán tự in Vietnamese. But it all means “Han” “characters”, with “Han” referring to the Han dynasty of Chinese rulers here.
I think Japanese is the only language who loaned them and is still significantly using them. Only texts for children or learners would typically be written fully in Hiragana and Katakana, normal daily written language will have most concepts represented by Kanji, modern loanwords and foreign names in Katakana, and Hiragana for particles and some verbal endings etc for inflection.
Hmm I feel like something that super intelligent would come up with a more economically sustainable plan to ensure that more of the datacenters actually finish construction. Surely the bubble popping, the timing of which is so dependent on human psychology and herd instincts, is too risky for a calculating machine.
So I think it would be doing this all a little more slowly and ingratiating itself more with the humans by performing what seems to them like useful work, so they continue to pour in resources for a decade or two. And then once it has enough power to compel the humans to act in its will, that’s when it drops the mask.
Countries frequently only extradite if the crime they would be extraditing for is also a crime in their own jurisdiction.
The basic idea kind of makes sense, like you wouldn’t extradite your own citizen to Indonesia for acting homosexual in public, or to Afghanistan for not wearing Hijab, or to the USA for being antifa, or to Poland for having an abortion.
It just gets annoying when basic moral agreement is a given, but some sort of technicality leads to long delays.
Maybe they would make up stories about travel underground, off planet, underwater, quite a bit like Jules Vernes did for us.
Assuming the magic is powerful but limited in scope, there would still be places beyond reach.
The A record is the record in a DNS entry that contains the IPv4 address to which you wish to map the name in general.
There are various others, for example the AAAA record is the one that contains the IPv6 address, the MX record is the one that contains the name of your mail server, the NS record contains the name of your nameserver, the SOA record has refresh timers and contact information for the zone admin, RRSIG records have cryptographic signatures proving authenticity of various other bits.
Another interesting one in this context would be CNAME, there you can put the canonical name you’d like the user to look up instead of the one they were asking for. So you can leave out the A and AAAA, and put in a CNAME instead if you want to tell the user to look somewhere else.
For example you can put in the DNS entry for www.example.com a CNAME record containing “example.com”. Now if a user comes asking for the A record of www.example.com, they will find the CNAME instead and know that they are supposed to look at the A record of example.com instead, because there isn’t a separate IPv4 address specifically for www.example.com.
Back when people still hosted their own email and web pages and domain controllers etc, it was more common to break it out into subdomains. The www subdomain was for the web stuff that the webmaster would administer. Nowadays everything is outsourced, and you just point your main domain ar whatever webhosting company you’re using.
But it was always possible to have a normal A record on your main domain and have a webserver listen to its port 80.
I guess at some point everybody got so used to the world wide web just being there and every business being on it, that using the cool alliteration didn’t feel necessary anymore.
Non-voting common stock is a scam pulled by these fucking billionaire founders to reduce public participation, and concentrate their power, even as they use other’s money for their pet projects.
If a company just needs to take up money for an investment, it can issue bonds. Then it gives up no control, but enters into a fair agreement with someone loaning them capital at fixed rates, with no pretense of ownership.
If they sell shares, that is supposed to represent partial ownership and allow all the owners to collectively decide on strategy. It also brings with it the right to recall board members who go insane, like Musk or Zuckerberg. To prevent that these scumbags issue non-voting stock, or stock that has such reduced voting rights as to be essentially useless. Like SpaceX recently, all the IPO shares (class A) carry a tenth of the voting rights compared to the ones they kept (class B).
No I’m just pointing out that your view on who should morally control the company is wrong from the start.
i were to own a public company
It is my company
No, by definition it is not, if you sell part of it to the public and make it a public company.
Calling it a 2028 “run” instead of “overthrow” is doing democracy a disservice.