While I agree about how shit OpenAI is, these are models that could only realistically be utilized by large, for-profit companies like Google and such, and… TBH I’d kinda rather they not get the chance.

Every accusation is a confession

It had no function or value beyond attempting to dismantle the federal government in an attempt to consolidate power.

I had thought it was meant to mean “following”.

That’s what “bolowing” meant?

i just get that client to connect outbound to the other client to initiate the tunnel

Is that something that has to be done on every connection?

I have sympathy for Heaven’s Gate victims. I don’t have sympathy for the Manson Family. Take from that what you will.

This is a hard one. Given that it seems you’re caring for someone who is incapable of caring for themselves, I personally wouldn’t feel right putting them in a position that could make things harder for them. At the same time, no one should be forced to deal with ongoing unwanted sexual behavior. Perhaps your employer would be willing to keep you away from that resident specifically?

I feel that we have more government in areas it absolutely doesn’t belong, and not enough where it belongs.

smALl GovERnmEnT

I’m gonna say probably not, but you have to question someone who willfully associates themselves with fascists who are provably close to figures like Vance.

Errors such as this have been occurring by human hands for decades, while adversarial networks and language models capable of making the same error have only been available for a few years. As such, attributing all such errors to AI is foolish, as humans have already proven capable of making the same types of mistakes.

AI

This kinda shit is as old as computers.

vim something.log
esc
quit
exit
ctrl+x
ctrl+q
shushejehojwhatiwibaln):gufht;vfgs+_&f
reboot
nano something.log

Reminder to everyone to cancel their Hulu/Disney+ subscriptions if they still have them.

Focusing on one part of your response that really rubs me the wrong way, you believe artists don’t need to be compensated for their work?

In most cases, Spider-Man has no natural webs, and instead uses web shooters and a special web fluid he invented. That said, in pretty much every case, he also has fairly extreme super strength, to the point that it’s revealed within the comics that he’s almost always holding back.

Well, my main concern is the characterization of this as “piracy.” It’s not like image generating AIs are reproducing their actual films, right? Sure, it could be used to produce similar artwork to comics or stills or something, but it’s not gonna recreate the substance of the media. Yet, that’s how they’ve chosen to classify it, and I worry that it could set a precedent that could be used to sort of sidestep fair use protections.

She bullied you and threatened you? It means you’re an easy mark to her. Someone she knows she can use as she pleases and discard when she no longer has a need.

“Midjourney has made a calculated and profit-driven decision to offer zero protection for copyright owners even though Midjourney knows about the breathtaking scope of its piracy and copyright infringement.”

That… sounds worrying. It’s not hard to imagine a success here eventually being extended to criminalize any and all fan art as “piracy.”

Every autistic person I’ve met has had more empathy than every Republican I’ve met.