good point. Loading up ukraine with nukes would have created a serious problem for russia. The problem is it would have given Ukraine independence from the US as well.

Netanyahu needs to be drone striked.

Mossad couldn’t stop october 7th, they can’t do shit.

Netanyahu: “Here I go, killing again!” If I was the US president would simply give Netanyahu the Osama Bin Laden treatment. Have some special ops dump his body in the ocean, send a message to the next Israeli PM there are consequences.

let me tell you about this secret knowledge lamestream media doesn’t want you to know

I mean lets not overdo it the algorithms were becoming very trash before it was bought up but it was usable. Peak twitter was like 2017

this is happened before after a capitalism crisis

pagers are small enough that its likely a number of people were injured by pagers that had like fallen out of somebody’s pocket.

Imo they need to send Benjamin Netanyahu to the Hydraulic Press Channel for execution via head squish. He’s killed too many children (1 would be too many, dude has thousands of dead children on his hands)

would you support Brazil if they made a giant mecha of Spongebob?

Imagine if everyone’s phone exploded to execute like 10 guys.

Edit: The take aways here are

1. Israel is a terrorist nation, that views civilian casualties as bonus points

2. any country who imports their electronics instead of making their own is susceptible to this kind of tampering.

3. The press is covering a terror attack like its some kind of new video game

4. All the unexploded ordinance can be delivered to Hezbollah as a gift. If the rumor is true that this was triggered because they became aware of the bombs, there will likely be many israelis killed by these explosives in the near future.

I hear a lot of generalities here, but nothing specific.

Which “Leftists” are you talking about? What things are being “ignored” that Harris said? That the 101st is doing training exercises in the EU?

People had 4 years of Trump. He has a record, you can look at it. He’s a lying politician now who made promises and never delivered. And after that debate it looks like the media may have been trying too hard to spin his faults, as they did with Biden.

Trump is well known to lie and take every position under the sun and nearby rocks, so saying things like “Trump doesn’t want war” is basically nonsense psychic mind reading. Rather than cherry picking responses it makes more sense to look at a politician’s actions in bulk. eg “What choices do they typically make?”

He bombed Syria, helped Saudi Arabia massacre people in Yemen and bombed an Iranian government official in Iraq in hopes of starting a war with Iran. These are not the actions of an anti war candidate.

Similarly saying “peacefully” once in a speech then following it with 10-20 “fight like hells” and similar over the next 50 minutes isn’t really that convincing of an argument. If I told you to be peaceful once and told you to fight somebody 10-20 times, what would your takeaway be?

A jury convicted Trump, not E Jean Caroll. Her testimony was a piece, but again a jury takes into account things like the fact that he frequently used assaulting women in changing rooms as a routine he employed. He had statements suggesting assaulting women was just normal behavior for a celebrity.

If you want to cherry pick Trump’s history that’s fine, just know that everybody sees you lying to them and will see you as a liar.

I get the desire to respond to current events but there’s nothing wrong with being a bit curious about why people don’t like the guy. Its weird to have so much grace for some random dude and none for the people criticizing him.

The media has sort of tossed him in with the “people who upset feminists” camp but like mostly its his “howto commit human trafficking” type videos that are generating criminal lawsuits.

don’t compare Tate to Assange. Tate is a common criminal who is dumb enough to go on camera and made howto videos on human trafficking and then tried to sell them to kids.

The allegations surrounding tate are more extreme than epstein and he has many recorded instances of himself describing the methods. This is a case that in US court would probably be easier to prosecute.

nobody is excusing him - I’m pointing out there are lots of reports of police assaulting women. Its frequent enough most major US papers have an article on costs cities pay associated with settling these allegations.

they’re rich AND a lot of people who should be arresting and prosecuting him have likely committed sex crimes themselves.

people forget it took 10+ years to put epstein in jail

Its like the US and Russia passing a blunt back and forth except the blunt is filled with afghans.