aN was under alquaeda not isis.

Your original comment makes it sound as if it was an offshoot of isis to people who dont check.

Sure, and yeah it was a joke.

But perhaps it means starmer isnt captured by this specific dark influence group.

If mandleson is criticising starmer perhaps starmer is not as bad as i thought.

No im not arguing its hard to define, im arguing that youll have to ban children from whats app. Private minecraft servers (even ones owned and run by the kids) too. If you dont do this you leave a space for the tech giants to bring the targeted ads and then youll have to ban kids from each space as they move in.

Any communication channel will fall to this if you take the approach of banning children from them one by one instead of stopping this behaviour by the tech giants entirely by legislating against targeted advertising directly. These services are just as toxic to adults.

Because the line between “social media” and “talking to other people” is so blurry as to not exist.

Also, and more importantly, the power of these companies is so great in effect youll only enforce that facebook etc. are the only ways of talking to each other that can exist legally and entrench the very problem you want to solve.

For example, is whats app social media?

Im not sure what youre arguing here? its possible to control access well as a parent, but so much easier if the state force everyone on the internet to provide id in order to prevent teenagers talking to eavh other?

You yourself csn target what you think is harmful but a law will hit everything and everyone, and like i implied in the driveby about roblox still might not actually block something you find unacceptable.

This is just the wrong approach to achieve the goal.

Youre on lemmy! This is like the one place people will decry facebook, x, reddit, insta etc. But what your arguing for will end up with them as the only services that can navigate existing legally, and children will still work around blocks because they simply dont care about consequences for lying about their age.

Dont worry theyll get plenty of poison after the ban too from roblox chat

One was 15. Not sure about the other. Lots of articles on this over the years.

Age of consent in the uk is 16 too.

I try to live my life so if anyone claimed i murdered babies people would react with incredulity, not guillotine images.

Thing is the specific guy we’re all thinking of ran a porn company. One with little consent.

I do think porn is a symptom not a cause and targetting it wont actually help. Mistreatment of women wasnt exactly rare in say the 50s, even if it wasnt filmed for money.

Thanks this is useful to know

The koch brothers were behind the tea party, and ive never seen anything linking them to russia.

At a guess that astroturf movement was hijacked by others but im not sure we can pin much of that on russia specifically.

One theory is putin is desperate to bait a nato attack he can spin as nato entering the ukraine war so he can retreat (or maybe escalate) while saving face.

Im not entirely convinced but its a solid enough theory

The other groups who do this are animal rights and anti-abortionists. I think its for the best, yeah

And you need a blank tape to copy to, the makers of which did have to pay a charge to content firms to cover piracy.

In this tortured analogy the blanks are also included in the ai firm product, so yes they would have had to pay

Porn and everything else that could potentially have porn. So everything.

The only reason to not shoot them down is cos it gives away the behaviour of the defence systems.

Best if we can find some 90s tech to shoot them with to keep putin guessing

Don’t worry NK, you’re also nothing without china

I have autoplay disabled, how is this cheeky video playing

Sure, NATO shouldn’t though as it’s a defensive alliance and palastine isn’t a member.

Same as NATO shouldn’t be intervening in Congo.

This is not complicated.