And that is supposed to be easier than 2 digits or something you have to look up on a chart?
And that is supposed to be easier than 2 digits or something you have to look up on a chart?
Wait, that was not supposed to be the house number? That is the actual street “name”? Ooof
But the guy that paints his face yellow is perfectly fine…?
I am not the one who made the initial claim, but if you want numbers: about 2 % of sunlight is a shorter wavelength than UV-B or about 70 W/m². If you want the same irradiance from a lamp, all you need to do is get closer, unless the lamp is really weak. 5 seconds is simply nothing.
What makes you think the sun has a massive UV-C output?
Why? You would not even notice that. You can already hold your hand in front of a UV-C lamp just fine.
Yes, but that is nothing. They loose 1000 soldiers every single day. Why should they care about a few (Russian) victims per month extra? Putin does not fear that at all. It is so irrelevant he might not even know about it to begin with. Let alone destabilizing the whole society, that is pure nonsense.
Everyone here jumps on the band wagon, but seriously, 500 is nothing. It will do absolutely nothing. He could not care less.
It has 2 different ways to open it. Just tilting it a bit and all the way.
We have these windows, they are 35 years old and were most certainly not the first of this kind.
I have seen pictures of actual concrete stairs like that, many years ago.
It is their name. They choose it, for whatever reason.
I never said anything about code reviews.
Can you define “thinking”? This is such a broad statement with so many implications. We have no idea how our brain functions.
I do not use this tool for talking. I use it for data analysis, simulations, MCU programming, … Instead of having to write all of that code myself, it only takes 5 minutes now.
Perhaps, yes.
Calculations with bugs do not magically produce correct results and plot them correctly. Neither can such simple code change values that were read from a file or device. Etc.
I do not care what you program and how bugs can sneak in there. I use it for data analysis, simulations etc. with exactly zero security implications or generally interactions with anything outside the computer.
The hostility here against anyone using LLMs/AI is absurd.
The good thing is that in code, if it makes shit up it simply does not work the way it is supposed to.
You can keep your hatred to yourself, let alone the bullshit you make up.
So you physically read what I said and then just went with “my bias against LLMs was proven” and wrote this reply? At no point did you actually try to understand what I said? Sorry but are you an LLM?
But seriously. If you ask someone on the phone “is it raining” and the person says “not now but it did a moment ago”, do you think the person is a fucking idiot because obviously the sun has been and still is shining? Or perhaps the context is different (a different location)? Do you understand that now?
When was the last time you tried? GPT5 thinking is able to create 500 lines of code without a single error, repeatable, and add new features into it seamlessly too. Hours of work with older LLMs reduced to minutes, I really like how much it enables me to do with my limited spare time. Same with “actual” engineering, the numbers were all correct the last few times. So things it had to find a way to calculate and then figure out some assumptions and then do the math! Sometimes it gets the context wrong and since it pretty much never asks questions back, the result was absurd for me, but somewhat correct for a different context. Really good stuff.
What do you want to achieve with it? They were still (super) unreliable last time I checked. Unreliable as in “you might as well roll a dice”. Oh and they all say they are world leading, best etc.