Tesla is STILL at the top? We are so fucked.

Dumping halve a ton of sugar in a truck is technically doable, but a bit harder than a bottle of cola.

So it will even set faster and really take at least 0.5 % to reduce the strength in any significant way.

Couple of bags (>= 2kg) or 2 liters of cola (200 g) to a truck load? Not only is there a magnitude difference, I also doubt that 2 kg will do that. Normal amounts are up to 0.1 %, say you need 0.5 % to make it significantly weaker. 10 cubic yards, 7.5 m³ of concrete, are about 18’000 kg. 0.5 % of that are 90 kg.

Every adult born after 1948 that I’ve met has been selfish to the core.

… What…? Are you a bot?

The best option is to waste as much time as possible.

It feels like you are talking about something else, not the issue from the TO. It is specifically saying something, intentionally, that is either wrong or unknown but in either case confidently, as if you know/are correct. And that is not the right thing to do. Perhaps there are rare edge cases where that would be okay.

Sports etc. seem super subjective, so it does not really apply there. I specially mean knowing better but still saying something wrong.

But you were not wrong and instead did the right thing? There is no need to confidently say nonsense.

I think the socialist part of that has thoroughly proved to not be successful given the recent struggles on top of all prior ones.

How can that be more important? What moment?

People can also be confidently wrong.

The same argument applies in every other voting system and that is simply not how it works. If you never vote what you actually want you will never get what you actually want. Saying all need to change at once is nonsense, a gradual shift is more than enough. But people argue exactly like that and so never vote what they want, that is the core issue. Other voting systems still see few % parties get nothing and the argument people use to not vote them is exactly the same. The has to be some cutoff below which you get nothing and there is no way to prevent that in a real system with integer numbers.

They have them, they just don’t vote them. The big brain argument is “because nobody does”.

Did you not read the definition above? It is pretty much the opposite. Just because 2 nations are formally at war with each other does not mean shit, there is a wiki article with absurd examples.

Those are perhaps hostile actions, but that is far away from war or “war campaign”.

A state, let alone a union of lots of states, are not at war because you feel like it. wiki: war

It is generally characterized by widespread violence, destruction, and mortality, using regular or irregular military forces.

So what makes you think the EU is at war and why are all the implications that would have missing?

Note that “being attacked” is something different than being at war, as per above, but I am not going to start a new discussion before we have not finished this one.

The EU is not at war.

Just note that you can not calculate like that. At war the whole economy switches over, instead of only a tiny fraction.

Shitting over Trump is not serious? Hmmm!